Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: accurate prognostic assessments of need of help, health and dwelling situation in stroke patients are important for patient management, rehabilitation, discharge planning, and for providing reliable information to patients and their relatives.
Objective: to analyse factors affecting the accuracy of discharge prognosis assessments.
Design: prospective study of stroke patients discharged from hospital.
Setting: two cities in central Sweden.
Subjects: three hundred and ninety stroke patients, 65 years or older, living in their own homes and having no dementia diagnosis prior to hospital admission.
Methods: at discharge, physicians, nurses, occupational therapists and physiotherapists in the Departments of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics were asked to make an individual prognosis assessment regarding patients' need for help, health and dwelling situation at 3 and 12 months after admission to hospital.
Results: the prognosis assessments were on average accurate in 68.4% (3 months) and 61.5% (12 months), far better than chance (33.3%). There were no significant differences between staff categories. The accuracy was influenced by a number of patient linked factors, such as activity degree, household situation before admission, and Mini Mental State Examination level and need of help measured 1 week after discharge, and ranged from 22 to 89%, depending on factor combinations.
Conclusions: prognosis assessments based on clinical judgement were on average quite accurate but the accuracy varied markedly with patient linked factors. Feedback of outcome might be one way to further improve the accuracy of prognosis assessment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl146 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!