Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Peritumoral retraction artefact appears in tissue sections as an empty space partially or completely encircling a nest of tumor cells, usually in conformity with the rounded or angular outline of that particular nest. The present study was designed to test this finding in a large series of cases and to quantify the appearance of peritumoral retraction artefact in, in situ and infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. We examined 199 cases of infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) and 188 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Of the total of 387 cases, 111 were core needle biopsies, whereas the others were larger resections. In each specimen, retraction was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides as negative, 1+ (1% to 25% of tumor showing retraction), 2+ (26% to 50%), 3+ (51% to 75%), or 4+ (76% to 100%). Overall, peritumoral retraction was noted in 168 of 199 cases (84.4%) of IDC, versus 30 of 188 cases (16%) of DCIS (P < 0.0001). Peritumoral retraction scored as 2+ or greater (26% to 50%) was seen in only 1 of 188 DCIS specimens, compared with 77 of 199 IDC. Thus, peritumoral retraction artefact appears to be a significant finding seen during the evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin specimens for the diagnosis of carcinoma. We discuss the possibility that this phenomenon might represent true prelymphatic space involvement rather than a fixation artefact.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066896906295690 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!