A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Artefact as the pathologist's friend: peritumoral retraction in in situ and infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. | LitMetric

Peritumoral retraction artefact appears in tissue sections as an empty space partially or completely encircling a nest of tumor cells, usually in conformity with the rounded or angular outline of that particular nest. The present study was designed to test this finding in a large series of cases and to quantify the appearance of peritumoral retraction artefact in, in situ and infiltrating duct carcinoma of the breast. We examined 199 cases of infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) and 188 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Of the total of 387 cases, 111 were core needle biopsies, whereas the others were larger resections. In each specimen, retraction was evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides as negative, 1+ (1% to 25% of tumor showing retraction), 2+ (26% to 50%), 3+ (51% to 75%), or 4+ (76% to 100%). Overall, peritumoral retraction was noted in 168 of 199 cases (84.4%) of IDC, versus 30 of 188 cases (16%) of DCIS (P < 0.0001). Peritumoral retraction scored as 2+ or greater (26% to 50%) was seen in only 1 of 188 DCIS specimens, compared with 77 of 199 IDC. Thus, peritumoral retraction artefact appears to be a significant finding seen during the evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin specimens for the diagnosis of carcinoma. We discuss the possibility that this phenomenon might represent true prelymphatic space involvement rather than a fixation artefact.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1066896906295690DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peritumoral retraction
24
infiltrating duct
12
duct carcinoma
12
retraction artefact
12
retraction
8
situ infiltrating
8
carcinoma breast
8
artefact appears
8
199 cases
8
188 cases
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!