The aim of this statistical note, the sixth in the series, is to introduce the rationale of the test of hypothesis suitable for comparing the effect of two treatments in a randomized controlled clinical trial of superiority. The presentation takes advantage of the analogy with a criminal trial debate based upon circumstantial evidence in an Italian Court. The results of three randomized controlled clinical trials: ISIS-1, AIMS and RESTORE are introduced and proper ways for their interpretation are suggested.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
randomized controlled
12
controlled clinical
12
test hypothesis
8
clinical trial
8
[what "p"
4
"p" conclusion
4
conclusion test
4
hypothesis randomized
4
trial superiority?]
4
superiority?] aim
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!