Background & Aims: The natural history of chronic portomesenteric (PM) and portosplenomesenteric (PSM) venous thrombosis is defined poorly. Therapeutic options are limited, and are directed at the prevention of variceal bleeding and the control of abdominal pain related to gastrointestinal hyperemia.

Methods: Patients with extensive PM and PSM thrombosis were reviewed retrospectively to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy and to determine which clinical variables had prognostic significance regarding long-term survival.

Results: Sixty patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 44 years (range, 18-68 y), were assessed. The median follow-up period was 3.5 years (range, 0.2-32.0 y). The overall survival rate was 73.3%, with 1- and 5-year survival rates of 81.6%, and 78.3%, respectively. One- and 5-year survival rates, excluding patients who died from malignancy-related causes, were 85.7% and 82.1%, respectively. Factors associated with improved survival included treatment with beta-blockers (P = .02; odds ratio [OR], .09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.70) and anticoagulation (P = .005; OR, 0.01; 95% CI, <0.01 to 0.26). Eighteen patients in total were anticoagulated, including 8 patients who had variceal bleeding, all of whom underwent endoscopic band ligation of esophageal varices before anticoagulation. By using Cox regression analysis, variables associated with reduced survival were the presence of ascites (P = .001; OR, 42.6; 95% CI, 5.03-360), and hyperbilirubinemia (P = .01; OR, 13.8; 95% CI, 1.9-100) at presentation. Six patients died of variceal hemorrhage.

Conclusions: Patients with chronic PM and PSM venous thrombosis without underlying malignancy have an acceptable long-term survival. Treatment with beta-blockers and anticoagulation appears to improve outcome.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

venous thrombosis
8
years range
8
5-year survival
8
survival rates
8
survival
5
chronic mesenteric
4
mesenteric venous
4
thrombosis evaluation
4
evaluation determinants
4
determinants survival
4

Similar Publications

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery remains underexplored, despite its potential impact on postoperative recovery. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive nomogram for assessing the risk of lower-limb DVT in such patients without chemoprophylaxis. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 935 patients with postoperative lower-limb vein ultrasonography.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Stenosis within the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) of hemodialysis patients leads to vascular access dysfunction and inadequate hemodialysis. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is the standard therapy for stenosis. However, rates of restenosis and loss of access patency remain high.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) represents a significant postoperative complication after artificial femoral head replacement, with the incidence increasing proportionally with patient age. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early postoperative use of intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC), followed by the combined use of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) after 48 hours, for the prevention of postoperative lower limb DVT in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. The retrospective study included 100 elderly patients who underwent unilateral femoral head replacement.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) leads to portal hypertension (PH) with its sequelae. Computed tomography spleno-mesenterico-portography (CT-SMPG) combines sequential CT spleno-portography and CT mesenterico-portography. CT-SMPG comprehensively illustrates the venous hemodynamic changes due to PH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Improved efficacy has been shown for amivantamab and amivantamab-based combination therapies in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to established treatment options in clinical trials. However, a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was observed in patients treated with amivantamab-based therapies, with considerable differences in VTE risk according to the line of systemic treatment, concomitant treatment with lazertinib, and intravenous vs. subcutaneous amivantamab administration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!