Background: PEG is a widely used method for providing nutritional support. Although pneumoperitoneum is a known finding after PEG placement, its true incidence is subject to debate. Small retrospective studies have found varied rates of free air after PEG placement.
Patients: There were a total of 65 patients.
Objective: To assess the true incidence of pneumoperitoneum and its clinical significance.
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: Long Island Jewish Medical Center.
Interventions: We obtained upright and anterior-posterior chest radiographs of 65 patients within 3 hours after PEG placement. Type of PEG tube, gauge of the needle used, number of sticks, and indications were recorded. The presence of pneumoperitoneum on the initial chest film was considered to be a positive finding. After a positive result, a repeat chest film was obtained 72 hours later to determine whether there was progression or resolution of the free air. Patients enrolled in the study were also monitored clinically for evidence of peritonitis.
Main Outcome: Of the 65 patients who underwent PEG placement, 13 developed a pneumoperitoneum on the initial chest radiograph; there was complete resolution of pneumoperitoneum at 72 hours in 10 of the 13 patients. In 3 patients, the free air persisted but was of no clinical significance.
Measurements: The free air was quantified by measuring the height of the air column under the diaphragm and was graded with a scoring system (0, no air; 1, small; 2, moderate; 3, large).
Results: Eleven patients who underwent PEG died during the hospitalization; none of the deaths were related to the PEG placement or pneumoperitoneum. The other 54 patients were discharged to a skilled nursing facility. No patients in the study had clinical evidence of peritonitis. There were no adverse events, ie, infection or bleeding, associated with the PEG placement in any of the patients.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that pneumoperitoneum after PEG placement is common and, in the absence of clinical symptoms, is of no clinical significance and does not warrant any further intervention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.088 | DOI Listing |
BMC Gastroenterol
December 2024
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, BronxCare Health System, Clinical Affiliate of Mt Sinai Health Systems and Academic Affiliate of Icahn School of Medicine, 10C, 1650 Selwyn Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10457, USA.
Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion, a routine procedure for long-term enteral nutrition, serves as a crucial intervention for patients who are incapable of tolerating oral intake or meeting adequate nutritional requirements. PEG tube placement carries complications like bleeding and infection. Impact of PEG tubes on the 30-day and long-term mortality in HIV patients is unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Background: Tolerance of enteral nutrition following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a barrier to discharge. This study investigated the impact of an expedited feeding protocol following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on postprocedure length of stay (LOS).
Methods: We performed a before-and-after cohort study on hospitalized adults in whom percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was placed by surgeons following the implementation of a standardized feeding protocol in which enteral feeds were resumed at the preoperative rate 6 h later.
Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med
November 2024
Loma Linda University Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda, California.
Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is a common procedure for patients requiring non-oral feeding. One rare complication of PEG placement is the formation of a gastrocolocutaneous fistula that develops when the bowel is caught between the stomach and abdominal wall during placement. This report explores an elderly patient's gastrocolocutaneous fistula development months post-PEG placement who presented with malodorous leakage from the gastrostomy tube to the emergency department (ED).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOral Oncol
January 2025
Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA. Electronic address:
Importance: The role of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with chemoradiation remains controversial and varies by center.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of prophylactic PEG tube placement in patients undergoing chemoradiation for HNC PEG tube use for more than 6 months and weight loss.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This single-institution retrospective study included 502 patients with head and neck cancer.
Pediatr Surg Int
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!