Broken bones and fractures - an audit of patients' perceptions.

Introduction: 'Have I got a fracture or a break doctor?' remains a commonly posed question in fracture clinics, suggesting that patients frequently feel a 'fracture' and a 'break' are two separate entities. This apparent misconception amongst fracture clinic patients may result in confusion and occasionally anger that doctors appear to have inconsistent views on the severity of their injury. Compliance and outcome of patient care can also be affected by poor communication.

Patients And Methods: Our questionnaire-based study was conducted in two stages. The initial objective was to establish whether this misconception surrounding the words 'fracture' and 'break' is commonly held amongst our out-patient trauma patients. The second stage of the audit was to determine whether a patient information leaflet on fractures/broken bones could help reduce this misconception.

Results: The preliminary audit involving 50 new patients attending our fracture clinic showed that 84% thought there was a difference between a 'fracture' and a 'break', with 68% believing a 'break' to be worse than a 'fracture'. Following the introduction of an information leaflet, a re-audit of 61 new patients took place. This time 67% felt there was a difference between a 'fracture' and a 'break', with 65% believing a 'break' to be worse than a 'fracture'. Only 21% had read the supplied information leaflet, and 69% of those still believed there was a difference between a 'fracture' and a 'break'.

Conclusions: The majority of patients believed that there was a difference between a 'fracture' and a 'break'. Access to information leaflets did not appear to alter this misconception. Verbal communication and explanation may be more beneficial and practical than visual aids and leaflets in overcoming this problem.