Can you justify not using ultrasound guidance for central venous access?

Crit Care

Department of Anaesthesia, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.

Published: March 2007

Karakitsos and coworkers, in this journal, reported further compelling evidence on the value of ultrasound in guiding internal jugular vein catheterization. In a large, prospective, randomized study of 900 patients, comparisons were made between patients in whom the procedure was performed using landmark-based techniques and those assigned to ultrasound guidance. The key benefits from use of ultrasound included reduction in needle puncture time, increased overall success rate (100% versus 94%), reduction in carotid puncture (1% versus 11%), reduction in carotid haematoma (0.4% versus 8.4%), reduction in haemothorax (0% versus 1.7%), decreased pneumothorax (0% versus 2.4%) and reduction in catheter-related infection (10% versus 16%). The implications of these findings are discussed, and a compelling case for routine use of ultrasound to guide central venous access is made.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1794450PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc5079DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ultrasound guidance
8
central venous
8
reduction carotid
8
versus
6
reduction
5
justify ultrasound
4
guidance central
4
venous access?
4
access? karakitsos
4
karakitsos coworkers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!