A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Surgery of mammary hypertrophy and ptosis using the dermal vault technique. 5 years' use (apropos of 230 surgically-treated patients]. | LitMetric

Using the simplest possible criteria, the author reviews the results obtained in 230 patients who underwent breast reduction using the dermal vault technique. A part from the usual criticisms of the technique defined by J.P. Lalardrie, the analysis reveals: 44% of "good" or "very good", 42% of "acceptable" results and 14% of "unacceptable results". The increase of "good" cases and decrease of "unacceptable" cases with time and the number of cases confirm the author in his opinion that it is worthwhile to continue with operative procedure.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dermal vault
8
vault technique
8
[surgery mammary
4
mammary hypertrophy
4
hypertrophy ptosis
4
ptosis dermal
4
technique years'
4
years' apropos
4
apropos 230
4
230 surgically-treated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!