[Reliability of neurological assessment scales in patients with stroke].

Arq Neuropsiquiatr

Faculdade de Medicina da Pontíficia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (FAMED, PUCRS), and Centro Neurovascular do Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Published: September 2006

Scales for the assessment of neurological impairment are employed in clinical trials, outcome evaluation and in therapeutic decisions. We evaluated the reliability of the Portuguese version of the Rankin Scale (RS), Barthel Index (BI) and the NIHSS (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) in 51 stroke patients, estimating the agreement of the results for examiners. The interrater reliability was measured using the Kappa Coefficient and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. The RS showed moderate, substantial and excellent coefficients of agreement. The BI showed from substantial to excellent coefficients of agreement as a whole and also for its constituents. This scale was stratified in prognostic and functional groups, both presenting coefficients of agreement from substantial to excellent. The NIHSS presented excellent agreement on its total and substantial agreements on its individual items. The NIHSS was also stratified in groups of points, which presented moderate or excellent coefficient, and in groups of congruous items, wich showed a moderate to excellent agreement. These results suggest that the Portuguese version of the RS, BI and the NIHSS present adequate reliability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0004-282x2006000400034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

substantial excellent
12
coefficients agreement
12
portuguese version
8
excellent coefficients
8
agreement substantial
8
excellent agreement
8
moderate excellent
8
agreement
6
excellent
6
[reliability neurological
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!