Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of using a targeted array-CGH strategy for prenatal diagnosis of genomic imbalances in a clinical setting of current pregnancies.
Methods: Women undergoing prenatal diagnosis were counseled and offered array-CGH (BCM V4.0) in addition to routine chromosome analysis. Array-CGH was performed with DNA directly from amniotic fluid cells with whole genome amplification, on chorionic villus samples with amplification as necessary, and on cultured cells without amplification.
Results: Ninety-eight pregnancies (56 amniotic fluid and 42 CVS specimens) were studied with complete concordance between karyotype and array results, including 5 positive cases with chromosomal abnormalities. There was complete concordance of array results for direct and cultured cell analysis in 57 cases tested by both methods. In 12 cases, the array detected copy number variation requiring testing of parental samples for optimal interpretation. Array-CGH results were available in an average of 6 and 16 days for direct and cultured cells, respectively. Patient acceptance of array-CGH testing was 74%.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of using array-CGH for prenatal diagnosis, including reliance on direct analysis without culturing cells. Use of array-CGH should increase the detection of abnormalities relative to the risk, and is an option for an enhanced level of screening for chromosomal abnormalities in high risk pregnancies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.gim.0000245576.47154.63 | DOI Listing |
J Obstet Gynaecol India
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan 334001 India.
J Obstet Gynaecol India
December 2024
Başkent University Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic, Konya, Turkey.
Background: Epignathus is a rare kind of teratoma. Its estimated incidence is one in 35,000-200,000 live births, and it may cause high mortality by causing airway obstruction in the neonatal period. It is generally diagnosed in the prenatal period.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Obstet Gynaecol India
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.
J Neuroimaging
January 2025
Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Background And Purpose: Anxiety during pregnancy is common, and exposure to heightened anxiety during pregnancy may influence children's brain development and functioning. However, it is unclear if exposure to low levels of anxiety in utero would also impact the developing brain. The current prospective and longitudinal study included 40 healthy pregnant women without pregnancy complications or previous diagnosis of anxiety disorders.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrenat Diagn
January 2025
Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Objective: To report a case of a fetus with multiple congenital anomalies and suspected Barth syndrome, highlighting potential phenotypic expansion of the syndrome.
Methods: A 32-year-old G4P2011 patient was referred at 18w5d gestation for suspected fetal encephalocele. Serial imaging, including ultrasound and MRI, was performed to evaluate fetal anomalies.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!