AI Article Synopsis

  • Heparin combined with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors is effective for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing PCI, but bivalirudin has emerged as a strong alternative.
  • In a study of 891 PCI patients with ACS, those on bivalirudin experienced better angiographic outcomes compared to those on heparin, despite fewer using adjunctive inhibitors.
  • No significant differences in bleeding events or major adverse cardiac events were noted between the two groups, suggesting that bivalirudin could be as effective and safe as heparin in this high-risk setting.

Article Abstract

Background: Heparin with adjunctive glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor (GP IIb/IIIa) inhibitors has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has recently been shown to be an effective alternative for patients undergoing elective PCI.

Objectives: To assess the angiographic and clinical outcomes of adjunctive pharmacological strategies in a high-risk population presenting with ACS.

Methods: Of 891 consecutive PCI patients with ACS, 304 received bivalirudin (60.5% male, 68+/-11 years) and were compared with 283 who received heparin (58.7% male, 66+/-12 years). A 30-day major adverse cardiac event was defined as the occurrence of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization or major hemorrhage.

Results: Adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 14.1% of the bivalirudin group and in 72.4% of the heparin group (P<0.010). The occurrence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow less than grade 3 was lower and the achievement of angiographic success was higher in the bivalirudin group than in the heparin group (5.2% versus 8.2%, 94.7% versus 89.7%, P=0.039 and P<0.010, respectively). There was no difference between groups in the incidence of bleeding events (bivalirudin 2.0% versus heparin 3.5%, P not significant) and in 30-day major adverse cardiac events (bivalirudin 8.3% versus heparin 5.7%, P=0.223).

Conclusions: In the high-risk cohort undergoing PCI, bivalirudin with provisional GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors achieved better angiographic results. Although not powered to show a difference, and while acknowledging that a selection bias could have affected the data, the present study showed that bivalirudin may be as clinically effective and safe as heparin with adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2569056PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70951-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

angiographic clinical
8
clinical outcomes
8
patients acute
8
acute coronary
8
coronary syndrome
8
undergoing percutaneous
8
percutaneous coronary
8
coronary intervention
8
iib/iiia inhibitors
8
bivalirudin
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!