Background: Multiple casualty incidents (MCI) highlight discrepancies between patient needs and available resources. It is generally thought that heavy patient loads adversely affect trauma health care delivery. The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of multiple casualty situations on the clinical outcomes of injured patients.

Methods: All severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > or = 12) who presented during a 12-month period to a regional trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. MCIs were defined as treating and admitting three or more trauma patients within a maximum of 3 hours. This cohort was compared with all other patients who did not meet MCI criteria.

Results: Ten percent (88/861) of all trauma patients were treated in an MCI setting. Groups did not vary among sex, age, ISS, or mechanism of injury (p > 0.05). MCI patients displayed a greater length of hospital stay, time to first surgical procedure, time to emergency laparotomy, and time spent in the emergency room (p < 0.05). MCI and non-MCI patients did not differ in ICU length of stay, postadmission morbidity, or mortality (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The impact of a MCI on the quality of trauma care has not been previously defined. MCI events delay definitive care and prolong a patient's length of stay. This is particularly concerning in the emergency department where a trauma center's ability to treat MCI patients effectively via an increased surge capacity relies on swift patient triage and flow. We are now investigating these issues in other trauma centers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000231764.00067.54DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multiple casualty
12
trauma patients
12
impact multiple
8
casualty incidents
8
clinical outcomes
8
mci
8
trauma
8
005 mci
8
mci patients
8
length stay
8

Similar Publications

Risk Factors for Limb Amputations in Modern Warfare Trauma: New Perspectives.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

January 2025

From the Israel Defense Forces, Medical Corps, Kiryat Ono (Shapira, and Epstein), the Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem (Shapira), the Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan (Shapira), the Israel National Center for Trauma and Emergency Medicine Research, Gertner Institute of Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan (Goldman, Givon, and Katorza), the Arrow Program for Medical Research Education, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan (Katorza), the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv (Katorza, Dudkiewicz, and Prat), the Rehabilitation Division, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan (Dudkiewicz), the Critical Care Division, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa (Epstein), the Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa (Epstein), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel (Prat).

Background: In modern conflicts, extremities are mainly affected, with limb amputations required for approximately 5% of severely injured combatants and 7% of those with serious limb injuries. Amputations are some of the most challenging injuries endured by survivors, significantly affecting the patients and the healthcare system. This study aims to describe the rates, characteristics, and risk factors of limb amputations in patients with serious extremity trauma during the 2023 conflict in Israel.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Management of mass casualty incidents: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

January 2025

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

Purpose: Our aim was to generate evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the management of mass casualty incidents (MCIs) based on current evidence. This guideline topic is part of the 2022 update of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries.

Methods: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched to August 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of preventable death in military and civilian trauma medicine. Fluid resuscitation is the primary treatment option, which can be difficult to manage when multiple patients are involved. Traditional vital signs needed to drive resuscitation therapy being unavailable without invasive catheter placement is a challenge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Can we realize seamless traffic safety at smart intersections by predicting and preventing impending crashes?

Accid Anal Prev

December 2024

UCF Smart & Safe Transportation Lab, Department of Civil, Environmental and Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, 12800 Pegasus Drive, Orlando, FL 32816, United States. Electronic address:

Intersections are frequently identified as crash hotspots for roadways in major cities, leading to significant human casualties. We propose crash likelihood prediction as an effective strategy to proactively prevent intersection crashes. So far, no reliable models have been developed for intersections that effectively account for the variation in crash types and the cyclical nature of Signal Phasing and Timing (SPaT) and traffic flow.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A high-performance core laboratory GFAP/UCH-L1 test for the prediction of intracranial injury after mild traumatic brain injury.

Am J Emerg Med

December 2024

Warfighter Readiness, Performance, and Brain Health Project Management Office (WRPBH PMO), US Army Medical Materiel Development Activity (USAMMDA), 1430 Veterans Drive, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • A blood biomarker panel including GFAP and UCH-L1 can potentially replace head CT scans for certain patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), as it shows high sensitivity and negative predictive values.
  • In a study with 1,899 TBI patients, the panel accurately identified the presence of traumatic intracranial injury in most cases, with a low false-negative rate.
  • The core lab-based platform allows for rapid analysis of multiple samples, which is particularly useful in urgent situations like mass casualty events or busy emergency departments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!