The role of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin in the management of gastric cancer resistant to first-line chemotherapy has not yet been defined. This multicenter prospective phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of the docetaxel-cisplatin combination in gastric cancer patients, whose tumors were primarily resistant to first-line chemotherapy or had tumor recurrence after chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 70 mg/m2 i.v. followed by cisplatin 70 mg/m2 both administered on day one, every three weeks. Thirty-two patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 60 years and the median performance status (ECOG) was 1. Six (19%) patients had tumor progression during adjuvant chemotherapy, 19 (59%) had tumor recurrence after primary chemotherapy and 7 (22%) had tumor progressing while on first-line chemotherapy. Twenty (62%) patients had received non-platinum agents as first-line chemotherapy, while the rest had received the so-called "new generation" regimen that contained cisplatin. Among 32 patients evaluable for response, there were 5 (16%) (CI 95%-8%-35%) partial responses, all in patients that had received non-platinum agents as first-line chemotherapy. Stable disease was recorded in 8 (25%) and progressive disease in 19 (59%) patients. The median response duration was 4 (range 3-6) months, the median time to progression was 5 (range 3-6) months, the median survival after second-line chemotherapy was 6 (range 2-24) months and the median survival after first-line chemotherapy was 12 (range 4-36) months. Myelotoxicity was the main toxicity with grade 3-4 neutropenia occurring in 19 (59%) of the patients and febrile neutropenia in 4 (12%) patients. G-CSF support was given to 25 (78%) patients. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was recorded in 4 (12%) patients. In conclusion, the combination of docetaxel plus cisplatin appears to be a moderately effective regimen with acceptable toxicity when G-CSF support is provided. According to our results, it seems that patients, whose tumors were not exposed to cisplatin during first-line chemotherapy, were more likely to respond to this regimen.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
BMC Cardiovasc Disord
January 2025
The second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xinjiang Hospital (People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Bainiaohu Hospital), Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830026, People's Republic of China.
Background: Several studies showed higher risks of cardiovascular complications to have been observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter have been more pronounced in patients with hyperglycemia. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are now considered as second-line treatment for patients with T2DM following inadequate glycemic control with first line agents.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Pediatr
January 2025
Department of Pediatrics, Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
The purpose of this study was to identify pediatric eosinophilic fasciitis, which is an extremely rare condition, in order to describe their clinical, paraclinical, and therapeutic characteristics. We made a call for observations via societies for pediatric rheumatology in France and surrounding countries and collected clinical and paraclinical data of the cases fulfilling the diagnostic criteria. Eight patients under 18 years of age with confirmed eosinophilic fasciitis followed between April 2004 and July 2022 in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain were included.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cancer Res Clin Oncol
January 2025
Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Purpose: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB) is the established first-line systemic therapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the optimal second-line treatment for patients unresponsive to AB remains undefined.
Patients And Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with uHCC who underwent second-line treatment with lenvatinib (LEN) or sorafenib (SOR) after AB failure at two academic centers between June 2018 and November 2023.
Farm Hosp
January 2025
Servicio de Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Juan Ramón Jiménez, Huelva, Spain.
Objective: Standard treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer includes oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion. Although FOLFOX-6 is the reference combination, it is aggressive and has high toxicity. Variants such as the TTD regimen, which does not include folinic acid or 5-fluorouracil bolus, are used.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet
January 2025
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Background: CheckMate 8HW prespecified dual primary endpoints, assessed in patients with centrally confirmed microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient status: progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with chemotherapy as first-line therapy and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab compared with nivolumab alone, regardless of previous systemic treatment for metastatic disease. In our previous report, nivolumab plus ipilimumab showed superior progression-free survival versus chemotherapy in first-line microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer in the CheckMate 8HW trial. Here, we report results from the prespecified interim analysis for the other primary endpoint of progression-free survival for nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus nivolumab across all treatment lines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!