Background: Little is known about the incidence of "wrong site surgery", but the consequences of this type of medical error can be severe. Guidance from both the USA and more recently the UK has highlighted the importance of preventing error by marking patients before surgery.
Objective: To investigate the experiences of wrong site surgery and current marking practices among clinicians in the UK before the release of a national Correct Site Surgery Alert.
Methods: 38 telephone or face-to-face interviews were conducted with consultant surgeons in ophthalmology, orthopaedics and urology in 14 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. The interviews were coded and analysed thematically using the software package QSR Nud*ist 6.
Results: Most surgeons had experience of wrong site surgery, but there was no clear pattern of underlying causes. Marking practices varied considerably. Surgeons were divided on the value of marking and varied in their practices. Orthopaedic surgeons reported that they marked before surgery; however, some urologists and ophthalmologists reported that they did not. There seemed to be no formal hospital policies in place specifically relating to wrong site surgery, and there were problems associated with implementing a system of marking in some cases. The methods used to mark patients also varied. Some surgeons believed that marking was a limited method of preventing wrong site surgery and may even increase the risk of wrong site surgery.
Conclusion: Marking practices are variable and marking is not always used. Introducing standard guidance on marking may reduce the overall risk of wrong site surgery, especially as clinicians work at different hospital sites. However, the more specific needs of people and specialties must also be considered.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2565824 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.018333 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Shifting Paradigms in Hemorrhoid Management: The Emergence and Impact of Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Sclerotherapy.
J Clin Med
November 2024
Medical Center for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210011, China.
Hemorrhoidal disease (HD) is a prevalent proctological condition that has puzzled people since ancient times, and the most common symptom is painless bleeding. Traditional treatments include conservative treatment, nonsurgical office-based treatments, and surgery. Sclerotherapy is one of the oldest forms of nonoperative intervention and is widely used to treat internal hemorrhoids with the development of endoscopy technology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInpatient topical glaucoma medication-ordering discrepancies: a study of frequency and risk factors for inaccurate reconciliation.
Can J Ophthalmol
December 2024
Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. Electronic address:
Objective: To describe the frequency of topical glaucoma medication-ordering discrepancies (MOD) during transitions of care and to explore factors that may be associated with an increased risk of MOD.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Participants: A random sample of adult patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) on at least 1 topical glaucoma medication admitted to any Cleveland Clinic facility between January 1, 2012, to January 1, 2023.
Flexible Spline Models for Blinded Sample Size Reestimation in Event-Driven Clinical Trials.
Pharm Stat
December 2024
Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Article Synopsis
- Event-driven trials maintain the target power for treatment effects by focusing on obtaining a required number of events, but they may take longer if the actual event rate is lower than expected.* -
- Blinded sample size reestimation (BSSR) uses interim data to adjust sample sizes if initial assumptions are incorrect, aiming to achieve the necessary number of events within the planned timeline.* -
- A new flexible spline-based BSSR method, specifically the Royston-Parmar model, shows improved accuracy in predicting event counts compared to traditional parametric models, as evidenced by simulation studies and real trial applications.*
Preventing Wrong-Level Spine Surgery.
Acta Neurochir Suppl
November 2024
McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Importance: Wrong-level spine surgery (WLSS), a medical error in which a surgeon operates at an unintended vertebral level, is considered a "never event." However, it continues to be a problem in spine surgery today despite the implementation of preventive measures such as the Universal Protocol. The consequences of this event are severe for both the afflicted patient and the treating physician and may result not only in physical harm but also in costly medicolegal proceedings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMaking wrong site surgery a "never event" in spinal deformity surgery by use of a "landmark vertebra" to eliminate variability in identifying a target vertebral level.
Spine Deform
November 2024
Division of Pediatric Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Purpose: Despite the introduction of "standardized counting" methods, errors in counting spinal levels and subsequent wrong-level surgery (WLS) remain critically important patient safety concerns. Previous work by our group has documented inconsistency in the identification of T12 despite the use of these systems including the Spinal Deformity Study Group (SDSG) conventions. To assist with consistent and repeatable identification of proposed preoperative surgical levels, the current study investigates a new strategy: utilization of a "landmark vertebra".
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!