[I have tested for you. Pachymetry devices].

J Fr Ophtalmol

Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des XV-XX, 28 rue de Charenton, 75012 Paris.

Published: May 2006

Different techniques are currently available to measure central corneal thickness: optical pachymetry, ultrasound pachymetry, optical coherence pachymetry, slit-scanning pachymetry, specular microscopy, and confocal microscopy. Ultrasound pachymetry is the gold standard. It is a noncontact and rapid technique with high precision, approximately 1%. The correlation between optical coherence pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry is high, with a 0.99 correlation coefficient. Nevertheless, optical coherence pachymetry measurements seem underestimated compared to ultrasound pachymetry measurements. Correlation of ultrasound pachymetry with the other techniques is less satisfying. If the ultrasound probe can be decontaminated for each patient, ultrasound pachymetry seems to be the best technique for measuring central corneal thickness. Otherwise, optical coherence pachymetry seems to be the most advantageous technique.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0181-5512(06)73954-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ultrasound pachymetry
24
optical coherence
16
coherence pachymetry
16
pachymetry
12
central corneal
8
corneal thickness
8
thickness optical
8
pachymetry ultrasound
8
pachymetry measurements
8
ultrasound
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!