A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Concurrent endoscopic sinus surgery and rhinoplasty. | LitMetric

Concurrent endoscopic sinus surgery and rhinoplasty.

Am J Rhinol

Department of Otolaryngology and Bronchoesophagology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Published: January 2007

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed the safety of performing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and rhinoplasty at the same time by reviewing the cases of 48 patients over a seven-year period.
  • Most patients (93.7%) had primary rhinoplasty, and the revision rate was low at 8.3%, with only minor complications occurring in 6.3% of cases.
  • The findings suggest that concurrent ESS and rhinoplasty is generally safe, particularly if patients with poor wound healing are properly screened before the procedure.

Article Abstract

Background: Concerns over increased surgical risk and associated complications have been reported regarding concurrent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and rhinoplasty procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall safety of these concurrent procedures in our experience.

Methods: A chart review was performed on 48 consecutive patients undergoing concurrent ESS and rhinoplasty between January 1998 and January 2005 with a mean follow-up of 12 months. The extent of surgical procedures, revisions required, and postoperative complications were documented.

Results: Thirty-one (65%) women and 17 (35%) men ranging in age from 16 to 56 years with a mean age of 37 years were included in this study. Forty-five patients (93.7%) underwent a primary rhinoplasty procedure, whereas the other three (6.3%) underwent a revision rhinoplasty. Four patients required minor rhinoplasty revision procedures for a rhinoplasty revision rate of 4/48 or 8.3%. Complications noted in three separate cases included partial nasal obstruction, pain near osteotomy site, and localized infection for a complication rate of 3/48 or 6.3%.

Conclusion: In this study, rhinoplasty revisions did not appear to be related to the fact that ESS was performed at the same time as rhinoplasty. In addition, the only complication possibly attributed to a combined approach was a postoperative infection that developed in an insulin-dependent diabetic patient who underwent a rhinoplasty for functional reasons. Consequently, we recommend screening patients with poor wound healing factors in addition to those with acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis or severe chronic rhinosinusitis before performing concurrent ESS and rhinoplasty. In our experience, complications noted during concurrent ESS and rhinoplasty were minor, indicating the overall safe nature of this combined procedure when performed in appropriate patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2006.20.2933DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ess rhinoplasty
16
rhinoplasty
12
concurrent ess
12
concurrent endoscopic
8
endoscopic sinus
8
sinus surgery
8
age years
8
rhinoplasty revision
8
chronic rhinosinusitis
8
concurrent
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!