Investigational, conceptual, and interventional advances in the neurosciences strain consensus in research ethics, clinical ethics, legal ethics, and jurisprudence and demand innovative adaptation in public policy. I review these advances, ask how they might change a range of policies, and conclude that their implications -- particularly relating to aggression -- are likely to have been underestimated.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.2990/1471-5457(2005)24[12:TBAAPP]2.0.CO;2 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
public policy
8
brain aggression
4
aggression public
4
policy investigational
4
investigational conceptual
4
conceptual interventional
4
interventional advances
4
advances neurosciences
4
neurosciences strain
4
strain consensus
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!