AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared the cellular and molecular effects of embryonic cell nuclear transfer (ECNT) versus somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in cattle to see if aggregating embryos could enhance cloning efficiency.
  • Aggregates of three embryos showed increased inner cell mass (ICM) and total cell (TC) numbers, particularly in ECNT embryos, although their development was hindered post-aggregation.
  • High levels of the embryonic transcript POU5F1 were linked to better survival rates in ECNT aggregates, which outperformed SCNT and in vitro-fertilized (IVF) embryos in terms of developmental success to weaning.

Article Abstract

Our objectives were to compare the cellular and molecular effects of aggregating bovine embryonic vs. somatic cell nuclear transfer (ECNT vs. SCNT) embryos and to determine whether aggregation can improve cattle cloning efficiency. We reconstructed cloned embryos from: 1) morula-derived blastomeres, 2) six adult male ear skin fibroblast lines, 3) one fetal female lung fibroblast line (BFF), and 4) two transgenic clonal strains derived from BFF. Embryos were cultured either singularly (1X) or as aggregates of three (3X). In vitro-fertilized (IVF) 1X and 3X embryos served as controls. After aggregation, the in vitro development of ECNT but not that of SCNT or IVF embryos was strongly compromised. The inner cell mass (ICM), total cell (TC) numbers, and ICM:TC ratios significantly increased for all the aggregates. The relative concentration of the key embryonic transcript POU5F1 (or OCT4) did not correlate with these increases, remaining unchanged in the ECNT and IVF aggregates and decreasing significantly in the SCNT aggregates. Overall, the IVF and 3X ECNT but not the 1X ECNT embryos had significantly higher relative POU5F1 levels than the SCNT embryos. High POU5F1 levels correlated with high in vivo survival, while no such correlation was noted for the ICM:TC ratios. Development to weaning was more than doubled in the ECNT aggregates (10/51 or 20% vs. 7/85 or 8% for 3X vs. 1X, respectively; P < 0.05). In contrast, the SCNT and IVF controls showed no improvement in survival. These data reveal striking biological differences between embryonic and somatic clones in response to aggregation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.050922DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

embryonic somatic
12
nuclear transfer
8
embryos
8
cloning efficiency
8
ecnt scnt
8
scnt embryos
8
ivf embryos
8
scnt ivf
8
icmtc ratios
8
pou5f1 levels
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!