Purpose: Adolescent smoking is associated with increased perceived stress and lower social status, but past research has not explored links between lower social status, stress, and smoking risk. This study examined whether the relation between social status and perceived stress could explain the association between lower social status and increased risk of smoking.
Methods: Data were collected from 1021 non-Hispanic black and white adolescents participating in a longitudinal school-based study. Students completed a questionnaire and parents provided information on their highest level of education. Hierarchical logistic regression estimated the effects of parental education, subjective social status (SSS), and stress on smoking risk.
Results: At baseline, students from families without a college-educated parent were at greater risk of current smoking (odds ratio [OR] some college = 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-3.67, and OR high school degree or less = 3.34, 95% CI = 1.67-6.60). Higher school SSS decreased risk of current smoking (OR = .73, 95% CI = .62-.87), and higher stress increased smoking risk (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01-1.08). There was no evidence that the effects of parental education were mediated through stress. At one-year follow-up, both lower school SSS and higher baseline stress were significantly associated with smoking initiation in preliminary models, but only baseline stress (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.11) predicted smoking initiation in multivariable models.
Discussion: These findings indicate that higher stress and lower social status increase risk of smoking, but that stress does not explain the association between lower social status and smoking. Therefore, stress reduction interventions may not alleviate social inequalities in teen smoking, but they do hold promise for youth smoking prevention.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.011 | DOI Listing |
J Int Med Res
January 2025
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Objective: To evaluate whether there is an association between maternal mental health, purchase of psychotropic drugs, socioeconomic status and major congenital anomalies in offspring.
Methods: A register-based cohort study of 6189 Finnish primiparous women who had a singleton delivery between 2009 and 2015. Data on pregnancy and delivery outcomes, psychiatric diagnosis, prescription drug purchases and offspring congenital anomalies were obtained from Finnish national registers.
J Health Serv Res Policy
January 2025
Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Objective: This study examined whether being scheduled in a screening clinic versus scheduled directly with a long-term provider to conduct a mental health intake (MHI) is associated with engagement in child psychiatry services in New England, USA.
Method: We used electronic medical record data from one safety-net hospital serving a predominantly low-income and minoritised population. The study sample included 815 youths aged 0 to 25 years, referred or scheduled for a MHI between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
January 2025
Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor. (C.C., L.B.M., L.D.L.).
Background: Few population-based studies have assessed sex differences in stroke recurrence. In addition, contributors to sex differences in recurrence and poststroke mortality, including social factors, are unclear. We investigated sex differences in these outcomes and the contribution of social, clinical, and behavioral factors to the sex differences.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gerontol Soc Work
January 2025
Wayne State University School of Social Work, Detroit, USA.
We examined information seeking strategies and predictors of service awareness from a 2019 survey of Detroit area adults. Participants were age 60+ (mean age = 72.10; SD = 8.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrev Med Rep
January 2025
Department of Communication, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Objective: Discrimination is a social determinant contributing to health inequities in the United States (US). This study investigated the prevalence of, and sociodemographic disparities in, perceived everyday discrimination among a national sample of US adults.
Methods: We used data from the 2023 National Health Interview Survey ( = 27,538) and estimated the prevalence of three perceived everyday discrimination outcomes (1) any discrimination, (2) unique components of the discrimination experience, and (3) the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) (range: 0-20) overall and by age, sex assigned at birth, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, educational attainment, income-to-poverty ratio, and urban-rural status.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!