Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to investigate whether the protective effect of endothelin-A (ET(A)) receptor antagonist BQ-123 against renal ischemia reperfusion (I/R) injury is related to nitric oxide (NO) production. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups: control, I/R, N sup omega nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), BQ, BQ+L-NAME, BQ+L-NAME+L-Arg groups. After urethane anesthesia, 30min renal ischemia and 2h reperfusion were performed in all groups except control group. Mean arterial pressures (MAP) during reperfusion in all L-NAME-treated groups were higher than during pre-ischemia and ischemia, however, MAP at 60th and 120th minute of reperfusion in control and BQ groups were lower than during ischemia. MAP of L-NAME-treated groups were significantly higher than the other groups during reperfusion period. The I/R caused lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation, however, BQ-123 treatment prevented oxidant injury. The inhibition of NO production prevented effect of BQ-123 treatment. Also, BQ-123 treatment caused an increase in superoxide dismutase and catalase activities. Both BQ-123 and L-NAME treatments prevented high xanthine oxidase activity. BQ-123 prevented risen myeloperoxidase activity and L-NAME reversed this effect of BQ-123 just like the addition of L-arginine to the treatment altered the effect of L-NAME. The plasma BUN was affected as increasing manner from L-NAME treatments; on the other hand, plasma Cr and Na concentrations were affected as decreasing manner from BQ-123 treatments. ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ-123 may be revealed a protective agent against renal I/R injury with a possible secondary pathway via its antioxidant effects. We suggest that BQ-123 may mediate the protective effect via a NO-dependent mechanism.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2006.08.039 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!