This is a small, good quality, randomized controlled trial that shows a modest slowing in the deterioration of VC and DLco with the addition of high dose N-acetylcysteine to standard therapy in IPF. Overall the study should be interpreted with caution given its high drop out rate, which may have biased the results towards a more dramatic slowing of the disease progression. There were no differences in dyspnea score or functional status. There was no increase in the adverse events in the N-acetylcysteine group and the medication is inexpensive. Given only modest effects of N-acetylcysteine on VC and DLco, no change in functional scores, and the flaws of the study we would hesitate to use N-acetylcysteine as standard therapy in all patients with IPF.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

n-acetylcysteine standard
8
standard therapy
8
clinical evidence-based
4
evidence-based medicine--clinical
4
medicine--clinical questions
4
questions acetylcysteine
4
acetylcysteine treatment
4
treatment foe?
4
foe? small
4
small good
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!