A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The clipped intestinal non-perforating anastomosis of small bowel: a new technique. | LitMetric

The clipped intestinal non-perforating anastomosis of small bowel: a new technique.

Pediatr Surg Int

Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Tuebingen, Hoppe Seyler Strasse 3, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany.

Published: January 2007

In contrast to adult surgery, the neonatal small intestine confronts the surgeon, depending on the age of the patient, with variable diameters of the intestine. Therefore, anastomoses are usually performed by hand with interrupted sutures. In the presented study, a new technique is demonstrated. An anastomosis in the distal ileum of Sprague Dawley rats was performed with a single clamp applicator (Anastoclip). Small bowel anastomoses were performed in 32 rats. The clipped bowel anastomosis was evaluated concerning stenosis, leakage, and adhesions in comparison to the sutured anastomosis. Tension test and X-ray examination were performed to measure the stability. The rats were sacrificed at day 3 or 14 after laparotomy. The clipped anastomosis is feasible, and faster to perform than the conventional hand-sutured anastomosis (Operation time: control group: 18.5 min versus clipped group 4 min; p > 0.05). Furthermore, there were differences in the mechanical stability, with higher tension forces needed for rupturing the clipped anastomosis. There were fewer stenoses (16.5 mm stenotic diameter in the control group versus 20.6 mm in the clipped group) and fewer adhesions in the group of the clipped anastomosis. Histological examinations were performed and did not show significant differences between the two groups. In the animal model presented, the clipped, intestinal, non-perforating anastomosis (CINPA) shows advantages compared to the common hand-sutured anastomosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00383-006-1803-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clipped anastomosis
12
anastomosis
10
clipped
8
clipped intestinal
8
intestinal non-perforating
8
non-perforating anastomosis
8
small bowel
8
anastomoses performed
8
hand-sutured anastomosis
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!