Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In the present study, we investigate the in vitro antimicrobial activity of macrolides, beta-lactams and tetracycline against Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. clinical and tick isolates. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in normal growth condition and after pre-exposure of the strains to sub-MIC of the founder of each drug family. All the classes of tested antibiotics showed good antibacterial activity against all the borreliae isolates and there were no significant susceptibility differences among clinical and tick isolates. After pre-exposure of the strains to sub-MIC of erythromycin, cefoxitin and tetracycline, we observed that some strains of B. burgdorferi s.l. showed higher MIC values to both the pre-exposed drug and drugs of the same family. The less susceptibility of borreliae, in the last growth condition in vitro, could be one of the justifications of clinical results indicating the limited efficacy of these antibiotics in treatment of B. burgdoferi infections.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/039463200601900310 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!