Aim: To evaluate changes in patient compliance with medical treatment while using the Proview Eye Pressure Monitor.
Methods: A crossover study design was used to compare the compliance of patients with established use of topical medication to lower intraocular pressure in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Thirty-two patients currently managed with latanoprost 0.005%, brimonidine 0.15%, travoprost 0.004% or bimatoprost 0.03% as monotherapy or in combination were randomly assigned to two study groups. Group 1 was instructed in the use of Proview Eye Pressure Monitor three times daily for 30 days as an adjunct to the glaucoma regimen. Group 2 was observed with no change in the patients' treatment regimen during this phase of study. A crossover occurred at 30 days. Compliance was monitored by assigning new bottles of topical medication during each phase of study. Bottles were weighed with a Mettler balance (Mettler Toledo Co.) at the initiation and completion of each phase. The changes in bottle-weight determined the amount of medication consumed by each patient for each phase of the study. The weights were analysed to estimate changes in compliance.
Results: A paired samples Student t-test compared the consumed bottle weights with and without Proview Eye Pressure Monitor usage. No statistical significance or trend was identifiable (p = 0.98). Use of the Proview Eye Pressure Monitor did not significantly change compliance with adjunct eye drop medication.
Conclusion: The use of the Proview Eye Pressure Monitor use did not improve but appeared to hinder compliance with glaucoma treatment in this study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2006.00081.x | DOI Listing |
Retina
October 2009
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Daegu Republic of Korea.
Purpose: Accurate assessment of tumor size is crucial in the treatment of choroidal melanoma. Digital fundus photographic systems can create a montage that clearly documents the tumor margins. These images can be used to measure tumor maximal linear dimension (MLD).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Opin Ophthalmol
March 2008
Duke University Eye Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Purpose Of Review: In the last 10 years, several new means to measure intraocular pressure have emerged. This review covers recent findings concerning four new technologies: the ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, rebound tonometry and the Proview phosphene tonometer.
Recent Findings: The ocular response analyzer provides measurements of corneal biomechanics, including corneal hysteresis.
Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol
December 2007
St Luc University Hospital, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels.
The Proview phosphene (eye-pressure) tonometer and the Rebound tonometer ICare are relatively new devices basically different from the Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Both technologies will be presented in this review with respect to their principle, their technique, their advantages and limits, as well as their accuracy, the IOP measurements agreement with GAT, and the influence of central corneal thickness on the reliability of these measurements. Because the current data base for the interpretation of glaucoma disease course and its management are still relatively small, the development of a continuous, accurate, reliable and harmless monitoring of IOP over 24 hours is strongly desirable in the future.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Exp Optom
July 2007
Southern College of Optometry Memphis, Tennessee 38104-2222, USA.
Background: Our aim was to examine whether training level and ocular factors could account for part of the difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and Proview Eye Pressure Monitor (PPT).
Methods: One hundred and nineteen individuals (238 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 35.
Can J Ophthalmol
December 2006
Eye Foundation of Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, MO 64108, USA.
Background: To compare intraocular pressures obtained using a handheld pressure phosphene tonometer (PPT) (Proview, Bausch & Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tampa, Fla.) with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!