A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Posterior stabilized component increased femoral bone loss after total knee replacement. 5-year follow-up of 47 knees using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • After total knee replacement (TKR), bone mineral density (BMD) often decreases in the area behind the femoral component, potentially raising the risk for fractures.
  • The study evaluated how different femoral designs and tibial insert types affect bone remodeling in the distal femur by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on 47 knees over 5 years.
  • Results showed a significant reduction in BMD behind the anterior flange, especially with posterior-stabilized inserts in knees with advanced deformities, suggesting a higher fracture risk compared to concave inserts.

Article Abstract

After total knee replacement (TKR) bone mineral density (BMD) commonly decreases behind the anterior flange of the femoral component, which may increase the risk for supracondylar fracture. Our aim was to evaluate if changes in femoral design and joint area constraint had any effect on the postoperative bone remodeling in the distal femur. We used dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 47 knees up to 5 years after operation with the AMK (DePuy, Johnson and Johnson Leeds, UK) TKR. The knees had been randomly allocated to receive a flat or a concave tibial insert with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament when preoperative deformity was less severe, and either a concave or a posterior-stabilized (PS) insert with resection of the posterior cruciate ligament when deformity was more pronounced. The most pronounced relative reduction (15-38%) in bone mineral density (BMD) was seen posterior to the anterior flange. There were no significant differences in relative change in BMD between flat and concave inserts. Knees operated with PS inserts had more reduction posterior to the flange than knees with concave inserts in the subgroup with more advanced preoperative deformity (23% and 38% respectively). Use of posterior stabilized insert may increase the risk of supracondylar fracture compared to concave insert in knees with advanced preoperative deformity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.08.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preoperative deformity
12
posterior stabilized
8
total knee
8
knee replacement
8
x-ray absorptiometry
8
bone mineral
8
mineral density
8
density bmd
8
anterior flange
8
increase risk
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!