Study Objectives: To determine the incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) in patients admitted to a medical service who were given unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to prevent venous thromboembolism, the incremental cost of developing HIT, and the cost consequences of using LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism in medical patients.
Design: Retrospective analysis with a nested case-control.
Setting: University-affiliated tertiary-care hospital.
Patients: A total of 10,121 adult medical patients admitted between August 1, 2000, and November 2, 2004, received UFH or LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism during their admission. From these, patients with immune-mediated HIT were identified and served as case patients, and 3-5 matched control patients were identified for each case patient.
Measurements And Main Results: The development of HIT was determined for patients who received LMWH and for patients who received UFH. Costs were compared between the patients with HIT and the matched control patients. The cost of using LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism was compared with the cost of using UFH. In patients receiving UFH and those receiving LMWH, the incidence of HIT was 0.51% (43/8420) and 0.084% (1/1189), respectively (p=0.037), with an overall incidence of 0.43% (44/10,121). Admissions that included development of HIT incurred an average cost of 56,364 dollars compared with 15,231 dollars (p<0.001) for admissions without HIT. Using LMWH to prevent venous thromboembolism in medical patients cost 13.88 dollars less per patient than using UFH.
Conclusions: For the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, LMWH was associated with a lower incidence of HIT than UFH in medical patients. An admission during which the patient develops HIT costs significantly more than an admission during which the patient does not develop HIT. Low-molecular-weight heparin is cost-effective for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.26.10.1438 | DOI Listing |
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi
December 2024
Institute of Hematology, Tongji Medical College Affiliated Union Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is clinically manifested as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). VTE is the third most prevalent vascular disease after coronary artery and cerebrovascular diseases. VTE is a multifactorial disease caused by the interaction of genetic and acquired risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBest Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol
September 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
The issue of obesity continues to reach new levels globally, affecting individuals across the age continuum. Obesity in pregnancy is associated with myriad comorbidities which may negatively impact the fetus, particularly dysfunctional labor and failure to progress ending in unplanned cesarean delivery. Neuraxial anesthesia represents the gold standard for cesarean delivery anesthesia and is increasingly beneficial for obese patients due to the risk of difficult airway.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUS Cardiol
November 2024
Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center Bethesda, MD.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, carries significant morbidity and mortality risks, and is conventionally managed with anticoagulation. In recent years, notable progress has been made in the therapeutic options available for the acute treatment of VTE. The heterogeneity within pulmonary embolism, spanning a wide spectrum of risks, underscores the critical need for precise risk stratification, particularly in identifying individuals prone to right heart failure and increased mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
January 2025
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) can increase morbidity and mortality for cancer patients. Therefore, guidelines recommend predicting VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis for high-risk patients. Many studies critique oncologists' adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines for cancer patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Trauma Acute Care Surg
January 2025
From the Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine (D.G., J.A.), Department of Neurosurgery (D.B., M.T.B., S.T.M., R.G.), Department of Surgery (S.L., J.C., M.M., T.E.), Division of Geriatrics and Department of Internal Medicine (M.P.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Bowers Neurosurgical Frailty and Outcomes Data Science Lab (C.A.B.), Flint, Michigan.
Background: Preinjury antithrombotic (AT) use is associated with worse outcomes for geriatric (65 years or older) patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Previous studies have found that use of AT outside established guidelines is widespread in TBI patients.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective cross-sectional study, we examined inappropriate AT use among geriatric patients presenting with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!