X-ray structures are known for three members of the Major Facilitator Superfamily (MFS) of membrane transporter proteins, thus enabling the use of homology modeling to extrapolate to other MFS members. However, before employing such models for, e.g., mutational or docking studies, it is essential to develop a measure of their quality. To aid development of such metrics, two disparate MFS members (NupG and GLUT1) have been modeled. In addition, control models were created with shuffled sequences, to mimic poor quality homology models. These models and the template crystal structures have been examined in terms of both static and dynamic indicators of structural quality. Comparison of the behavior of modeled structures with the crystal structures in molecular dynamics simulations provided a metric for model quality. Docking of the inhibitor forskolin to GLUT1 and to a control model revealed significant differences, indicating that we may identify accurate models despite low sequence identity between target sequences and templates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1630476PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.093971DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major facilitator
8
facilitator superfamily
8
mfs members
8
crystal structures
8
models
5
modeling docking
4
docking simulation
4
simulation major
4
superfamily x-ray
4
structures
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!