A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period]. | LitMetric

[Random comparative study between intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 and TCu 380a inserted in the postpartum period].

Ginecol Obstet Mex

Departamento de planificación familiar del Instituto Naciónal de Perinatología. Lomas Virreyes, México.

Published: June 2006

Objective: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the intrauterine device Multiload Cu375 compared with the TCu 380A inserted in the postpartum period.

Patients And Methods: In a randomized comparative study carried out in the National Perinatology Institute, intrauterine devices MLCu 375 and Tcu 380A were inserted to 157 patients who voluntary accepted, and previously signed informed consent. There were four instances for the intrauterine devices insertion: within 10 minutes after vaginal delivery, during cesarean section (immediate postplacental insertion) and postpartum-postcesarean insertion (in the time range of 10 min to 48 h). All insertions were made with ring forceps. From 1 h to 24 h later, abdominal ultrasound examinations were performed to assess the distances between the upper part of the device to the fundus of uterine cavity. Follow up visits were scheduled at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Net cumulative life table event rates of discontinuations were estimated at one year.

Results: The expulsion rates were 10.4 for the MLCu 375 and 7.7 for the TCu 380A and they were not influenced by the moment of the intrauterine device insertion, not by the cervical dilatation, neither by the distance of the intrauterine device to the fundus of uterine cavity. The removal rates for bleeding and pain were 4.9 and 4.8, the removal rates for non medical reasons were 3.7 and 4.9 respectively. There was one case of genital infection in the MLCu 375 group. There were no pregnancies, nor uterine perforation. The one year continuation rates were 77.1 and 82.6 respectively. There were no statistical significant differences in the comparative rates.

Conclusions: The intrauterine device MLCu 375 is as safe and effective as the TCu380A when they are inserted in the postpartum period.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intrauterine device
20
tcu 380a
16
mlcu 375
16
380a inserted
12
inserted postpartum
12
comparative study
8
device multiload
8
multiload cu375
8
intrauterine devices
8
375 tcu
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!