Background: Dysfunction and damage of the human central nervous system can be detected with biochemical markers, and protein S-100B is the best-established such marker. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the protein is stable during long-term storage, to establish reference values for the new Elecsys S100 test and to compare this new method with the Liaison Sangtec 100 test.

Methods: We analysed blood samples from 118 blood donors and 196 patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage or head injury. The long-term stability of S-100B in frozen serum samples was evaluated with repeated analysis in 1997 and 2003 using an immunoradiometric assay. Method comparison between the Liaison Sangtec 100 and Elecsys S100 tests was performed using Bland-Altman difference plots.

Results: Serum concentrations increased significantly during long-term storage (mean difference 0.15 microg/L; +/-2 SD, 0.55 microg/L). Serum measurements using the Elecsys S100 method in 118 healthy blood donors showed S-100B levels between 0.02 and 0.08 microg/L (mean 0.05). The 95th percentile was 0.07 microg/L. The Liaison Sangtec 100 test usually measured higher concentrations than the Elecsys S100 method, and the difference between the two methods increased with increasing concentrations. The mean difference between the methods was 0.14 microg/L (+/-2 SD, 0.39 microg/L).

Conclusions: Protein S-100B is not stable during long-term storage and the two analytical methods are not interchangeable.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.211DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

elecsys s100
16
protein s-100b
12
long-term storage
12
liaison sangtec
12
sangtec 100
12
stable long-term
8
blood donors
8
microg/l +/-2
8
s100 method
8
difference methods
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: We examined whether the aging suppressor KLOTHO gene's functionally advantageous KL-VS variant (KL-VS heterozygosity [KL-VS]) confers resilience against deleterious effects of aging indexed by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of neuroinflammation (interleukin-6 [IL-6], S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B], triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells [sTREM2], chitinase-3-like protein 1 [YKL-40], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]), neurodegeneration (total α-synuclein [α-Syn], neurofilament light chain protein), and synaptic dysfunction (neurogranin [Ng]).

Methods: This Alzheimer disease risk-enriched cohort consisted of 454 cognitively unimpaired adults (M= 61.5 ± 7.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

S100B is an essential biomarker in the early diagnosis and treatment monitoring of brain injury. However, the traditional clinical diagnostic assay for S100B detection requires a complex operation or large equipment, which limits its application for rapid point-of-care tests (POCT). This study aimed to establish a lateral-flow immunoassay (LFIA) strip test system for S100B determination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Traumatic brain injury is a common ED presentation. CT-head utilisation is escalating, exacerbating resource pressure in the ED. The biomarker S100B could assist clinicians with CT-head decisions by excluding intracranial pathology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Scientists are studying blood markers that can help doctors understand how serious a brain injury is after someone has a cardiac arrest (when the heart stops).
  • They are doing tests to find out which blood marker is the best at predicting how well a person will recover after six months.
  • The goal is to set clear rules for doctors to follow so they can use these markers in everyday medical care to help patients better.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the association of plasma ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) with intracranial abnormalities visible on a computed tomography (CT) scan (CT positive) and injury severity in acute traumatic brain injury (TBI). For these purposes, a cohort of 109 adult TBI patients was recruited within 6 h from the injury event. A hyperacute subcohort of 20 patients who had their blood collected within 2 h from injury was analyzed separately for early acute biomarker levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!