Management of infection at the site of a total knee arthroplasty.

Instr Course Lect

Department of Orthopaedics, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Published: December 2006

Infection following total knee arthroplasty remains a major complication in joint reconstruction, resulting in significant morbidity to the patient and increased hospital costs. The diagnosis of infection is often made based on clinical criteria, although adjunctive measures including blood work, plain radiographs, and arthrocentesis are often helpful in confirming the diagnosis and planning subsequent treatment. For patients in whom the diagnosis of infection cannot be immediately confirmed, an acute intraoperative tissue analysis by a skilled pathologist and experienced surgeon is required. Treatment of this complication is directed by the chronicity of the infection, stability of the components, and medical status of the patient. Although débridement with component retention may be successful in the acute postoperative stage of joint replacement, a two-staged revision with removal of all components followed by an adequate course of parenteral antibiotics prior to reimplantation remains the gold standard for eradicating chronic infection. The addition of antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers (static or articulating) has also been implicated as a useful adjunct to treatment. Long-term suppressive antibiotic treatment, arthrodesis, resection arthroplasty, and amputation are reserved for specific clinical situations in which a staged revision or débridement are unlikely to yield favorable results.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

total knee
8
knee arthroplasty
8
diagnosis infection
8
infection
5
management infection
4
infection site
4
site total
4
arthroplasty infection
4
infection total
4
arthroplasty remains
4

Similar Publications

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the distribution of the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotype between the healthy population and the arthritic population in Japan.

Methods: The retrospective cross-sectional study included 1049 knees. There were 256 healthy individuals with a total of 512 knees and 310 individuals with a total of 537 arthritic knees who underwent around-knee osteotomy between June 2010 and January 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Individualized total knee arthroplasty achieves better functional results than off-the-shelf implants in patients undergoing personalized coronal alignment.

Knee

January 2025

IULS-University Institute for Locomotion and Sports, Pasteur 2 Hospital, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France; ICARE Team, Côte d'Azur University, Inserm, CNRS, Valrose Institute of Biology, Nice, France. Electronic address:

Background: Several studies have demonstrated the interest in patient-specific custom cutting guides in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but clinical improvement remains debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes (Forgotten Joint Score, FJS) of patients undergoing individualized TKA compared with those receiving off-the-shelf (OTS) implants, both using patient-specific cutting guides with personalized alignment over a minimum follow up period of 12 months. We hypothesized that individualized TKA demonstrates significantly better functional outcomes than OTS TKA (FJS and percentage of patients reaching the minimum clinically important difference).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes in two patient groups: first, varus aligned medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) patients who underwent posteromedial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (PMOWHTO) and simultaneous root repair; second, patients with varus medial knee osteoarthritis without MMPRT who underwent PMOWHTO.

Methods: Patients had MMPRT repair concomitant with PMOWHTO and varus medial knee osteoarthritis without concomitant root tear patients who underwent PMOWHTO and were reviewed. Radiographic parameters, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and Knee Society Scores [KSSs, including the following subscores: knee score (KS) and knee function score (KFS)] were evaluated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Precise and accurate glenoid preparation is important for the success of shoulder arthroplasty. Despite advancements in preoperative planning software and enabling technologies, most surgeons execute the procedure manually. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) facilitates accurate glenoid guide pin placement for cannulated reaming; however, few commercially available systems offer depth of reaming control.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!