Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Osteolysis is the greatest threat to the viability of modern acetabular implants. The etiology and natural history of osteolysis remain unknown. Patients with cementless implants who have osteolysis are challenging to treat. There are no standards for follow-up methods or frequency, and there is little evidence to support timing of the decision to begin treatment in these patients. The natural history of proposed treatment options is also unknown. Reconstruction of the acetabulum in the presence of bone loss is difficult. Classifications have been developed to guide management. Multiple options exist for revision acetabular surgery, and it is important to understand the rationale and data in support of these options. A review of the literature was undertaken and algorithms were developed to help address acetabular bone loss in patients undergoing revision surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!