Normal childbirth has become jeopardized by inexorably rising interventions around the world. In many countries and settings, cesarean surgery, labor induction, and epidural analgesia continue to increase beyond all precedent, and without convincing evidence that these actions result in improved outcomes (1,2). Use of electronic fetal monitoring is endemic, despite evidence of its ineffectiveness and consequences for most parturients (1,3); ultrasound examinations are too often done unnecessarily, redundantly, or for frivolous rather than indicated reasons (4); episiotomies are still routine in many settings despite clear evidence that this surgery results in more harm than good (5); and medical procedures, unphysiological positions, pubic shaving and enemas, intravenous lines, enforced fasting, drugs, and early mother-infant separation are used unnecessarily (1). Clinicians write and talk about the ideal of evidence-based obstetrics, but do not practice it consistently, if at all. Why do women go along with this stuff? In this Roundtable Discussion, Part 2, we asked some maternity care professionals and advocates to discuss this question.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00110.x | DOI Listing |
Australas Emerg Care
October 2024
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Fiji National University, Fiji.
Introduction: Natural hazards resulting in disasters are increasing globally, impacting communities and disrupting industries. In addition to planning for these natural hazard disasters, emergency departments (EDs) should prepare for chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) incidents that result in surges of patient presentations. Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear incidents differ in preparedness to natural hazards, requiring an understanding of patient management and health system-related challenges.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWomens Health (Lond)
July 2024
National Diaper Bank Network, New Haven, CT, USA.
Background: The United States is increasingly recognizing period product insecurity, insufficient access to menstrual products and limited private spaces for managing menstruation due to financial constraints, as an issue impacting the well-being and dignity of Americans. One strategy to address period product insecurity has been distributing free period products via period supply banks. The outcomes of period product distribution outside the school setting are absent from the literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMidwifery
August 2024
School of Health, Science and Wellbeing Staffordshire University, UK. Electronic address:
Background: Research has found that twins and multiples are less likely to be breastfed than singleton babies. Exploration of the experience of breastfeeding twins and multiples from parents' perspectives is limited, and we know little about the experiences of those who breastfeed twins and multiples and the possible barriers they face.
Aim: The aim of the research was to explore experiences of breastfeeding twins and multiples in the UK from the perspective of birthing parents.
Lancet
March 2024
Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne and Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Neuroophthalmology
September 2023
Independent researcher, Mexico City, Mexico.
Vision specialists will benefit from increased awareness of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) syndrome. Failure to adequately identify the chief complaint as a visual symptom may lead to incorrect diagnosis or diagnostic delay. A previously healthy, 59-year-old woman presented with a 5-year history of 'losing her stuff'.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!