Development and validation of the pediatric nausea assessment tool for use in children receiving antineoplastic agents.

Pharmacotherapy

Department of Pharmacy, Divisions of Haematology-Oncology, Population Health Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Published: September 2006

Study Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to assess nausea intensity in children aged 4-18 years.

Design: Prospective, descriptive study.

Setting: Tertiary-quaternary, university-affiliated pediatric hospital.

Patients: Four pediatric inpatient groups (177 patients): group 1 (107), those receiving cancer chemotherapy; group 2 (24), those receiving cancer chemotherapy before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; group 3 (23), those with cancer who were not receiving cancer chemotherapy; and group 4 (23), those without cancer.

Intervention: We developed a scale with a standard script for administration, the Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT). Revisions were made after face validity testing with clinicians and parents, and pilot testing with 15 inpatients undergoing chemotherapy.

Measurements And Main Results: The PeNAT scores were obtained 4-24 hours after chemotherapy in groups 1 and 2. Dietary intake scores and number of emetic episodes were recorded for the 4 hours before PeNAT administration for all patients in group 2 and 36 patients in group 1. Parents of a subset of patients made an independent assessment of their child's nausea and pain intensities immediately before PeNAT administration. Reliability was evaluated in groups 1 and 2 by correlating the first and second (obtained 1 hr after the first) PeNAT scores. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing PeNAT scores in groups 1-4. Criterion-related validity was evaluated by correlating PeNAT scores with emetic episodes and dietary intake. Convergent and discriminant validity were evaluated by correlating PeNAT scores with parental assessments of nausea and pain. Significant differences in PeNAT scores were noted among the study groups (p=0.035). Moderate correlation was noted between the first and second PeNAT scores (Spearman rho = 0.649). The PeNAT scores correlated modestly with emetic episodes (Spearman rho = 0.322) but not with dietary intake (Spearman rho = -0.217). Children's PeNAT scores correlated moderately with their parents' assessment of nausea (Spearman rho = 0.442), whereas little correlation was seen between children's PeNAT scores and parents' assessment of pain (Spearman rho = 0.167).

Conclusion: The PeNAT is a new instrument that can be used by children to assess nausea intensity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.26.9.1221DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penat scores
40
spearman rho
20
penat
14
patients group
12
receiving cancer
12
cancer chemotherapy
12
dietary intake
12
emetic episodes
12
validity evaluated
12
scores
11

Similar Publications

Purpose: To optimize recognition and management of nausea in children with cancer using patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to identify preferences of children with cancer regarding two validated tools: the Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale and the Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT).

Design And Methods: This quantitative descriptive cross-sectional study (n = 34) used bespoke questionnaires to measure feasibility and face validity of the BARF and the PeNAT. Feasibility included the items: understanding, ease of use, and communication.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To translate the Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT) into Hindi and validate it in Indian pediatric cancer patients and survivors.

Methods: The PeNAT-Hindi was finalized by forward and backward translations, and pilot testing. The PeNAT-Hindi was administered to 200 Hindi-speaking pediatric (4-18 y) cancer patients/survivors, in three groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Chemotherapy-induced nausea can be distressing and difficult to manage in children with cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of ginger aromatherapy in relieving chemotherapy-induced nausea in children with cancer.

Method: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 49 children with cancer explored whether inhalation of the aroma of essential oil of ginger during chemotherapy decreased nausea compared with a placebo (water) or control (Johnson's baby shampoo) measured by prechemotherapy and postchemotherapy assessment with the Pediatric Nausea Assessment Tool (PeNAT).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development and validation of the pediatric nausea assessment tool for use in children receiving antineoplastic agents.

Pharmacotherapy

September 2006

Department of Pharmacy, Divisions of Haematology-Oncology, Population Health Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Study Objective: To develop and validate an instrument to assess nausea intensity in children aged 4-18 years.

Design: Prospective, descriptive study.

Setting: Tertiary-quaternary, university-affiliated pediatric hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!