Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In the Cro protein family, an evolutionary change in secondary structure has converted an alpha-helical fold to a mixture of alpha-helix and beta-sheet. P22 Cro and lambda Cro represent the ancestral all-alpha and descendant alpha+beta folds, respectively. The major structural differences between these proteins are at the C-terminal end of the domain (residues 34-56), where two alpha-helices in P22 Cro align with two beta-strands in lambda Cro. We sought to assess the possibility that smooth evolutionary transitions could have converted the all-alpha structure to the alpha+beta structure through sequences that could adopt both folds. First, we used scanning mutagenesis to identify and compare patterns of key stabilizing residues in the C-terminal regions of both P22 Cro and lambda Cro. These patterns exhibited little similarity to each other, with structurally important residues in the two proteins most often occurring at different sequence positions. Second, "hybrid scanning" studies, involving replacement of each wild-type residue in P22 Cro with the aligned wild-type residue in lambda Cro and vice versa, revealed five or six residues in each protein that strongly destabilized the other. These results suggest that key stability determinants for each Cro fold are quite different and that the P22 Cro sequence strongly favors the all-alpha structure while the lambda Cro sequence strongly favors the alpha+beta structure. Nonetheless, we were able to design a "structurally ambivalent" sequence fragment (SASF1), which corresponded to residues 39-56 and simultaneously incorporated most key stabilizing residues for both P22 Cro and lambda Cro. NMR experiments showed SASF1 to stably fold as a beta-hairpin when incorporated into the lambda Cro sequence but as a pair of alpha-helices when incorporated into P22 Cro.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi060853p | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!