[Patients--a useful resource when evaluating medical students' clinical practice?].

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen

Seksjon for allmennmedisin, Universitetet i Oslo, Postboks 1130 Blindern 0318 Oslo.

Published: August 2006

Background: Many medical students experience that they do not get satisfactory feedback during their general practice preceptorship. We wanted to explore whether an evaluation questionnaire answered by patients could be a useful tool for students and tutors.

Material And Methods: The Department of General Practice and Community Medicine at the University of Oslo invited medical students who attended general practice preceptorship during spring 2005 to participate. The questionnaire consisted of eight questions regarding the consultation. Both tutors and students also considered the benefits of the evaluation form in a subsequent questionnaire. The answers to both of the questionnaires were analysed statistically. Some students were organised into focus groups that discussed the use of patient questionnaires before and after the preceptorship period.

Results: 648 patients answered questionnaires following 36 students' independent consultations. The patient, the observing tutor and the student assessed 63 of these consultations. The patients scored eight issues with mean values from 4.3 to 5.0, with 5.0 being the best possible result. The questionnaires from the observed consultations showed that the tutors' assessment did not differ from the patients' on five out of seven compared issues. The tutors gave higher scores on the subject of the student's use of complicated language, and lower on the subject of physical examination. The students' self-assessment was significantly lower in six out of seven issues. The reactions to the questionnaire from both tutors and students were mixed. The students expressed that the use of questionnaires might contribute to better feedback from the preceptors or to obtain more independent consultations.

Interpretation: The students' consultations received a very high score from both patients and tutors, while the students themselves scored their own achievements lower. The evaluation questionnaires may be useful tools to improve feedback to students on their consultations in the preceptorship period.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general practice
12
tutors students
12
students
9
medical students
8
practice preceptorship
8
questionnaires
6
consultations
5
[patients--a resource
4
resource evaluating
4
evaluating medical
4

Similar Publications

Time to neonatal mortality and its predictors among preterm neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit in northern Ethiopia, 2023/2024: a retrospective cohort study.

Arch Public Health

January 2025

Department of Maternity and Neonatal Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Aksum University, Aksum, Tigray, Ethiopia.

Background: A preterm neonate is defined by the World Health Organization as a child delivered before 37 weeks of gestation. In low- and middle-income countries, including Ethiopia, preterm-related complications are serious health problems due to increases in the mortality and morbidity of newborns and children under 5 years of age. The aim of this study was to assess the time to neonatal mortality and its predictors among preterm neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit in northern Ethiopia, 2023/2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and/or vomiting (CINV) is an intractable adverse effect of anticancer drugs. Although prophylactic use of fosaprepitant may be effective in reducing CINV, there is a lack of studies evaluating the application of fosaprepitant in real world.

Aims And Methods: This study prospectively observed the effectiveness and safety for the prophylaxis of CINV in a real-world clinical setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nonacademic predictors of China medical licensing examination.

BMC Med Educ

January 2025

Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Lab of Functional Imaging and Tianjin Institute of Radiology and State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, 300052, China.

Background: National Medical Licensing Examination (NMLE) is the entrance exam for medical practice in China, and its general medical knowledge test (GMKT) evaluates abilities of medical students to comprehensively apply medical knowledge to clinical practice. This study aimed to identify nonacademic predictors of GMKT performance, which would benefit medical schools in designing appropriate strategies and techniques to facilitate the transition from medical students to qualified medical practitioners.

Methods: In 1202 medical students, we conducted the deletion-substitution-addition (DSA) and structural equation model (SEM) analyses to identify nonacademic predictors of GMKT performance from 98 candidate variables including early life events, physical conditions, psychological and personality assessments, cognitive abilities, and socioeconomic conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The integration of real-world evidence (RWE) from real-world data (RWD) in clinical research is crucial for bridging the gap between clinical trial results and real-world outcomes. Analyzing routinely collected data to generate clinical evidence faces methodological concerns like confounding and bias, similar to prospectively documented observational studies. This study focuses on additional limitations frequently reported in the literature, providing an overview of the challenges and biases inherent to analyzing routine clinical care data, including health claims data (hereafter: routine data).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Virtual care (VC) for dementia in primary care settings is an important aspect of healthcare delivery in Canada. However, the evidence informing optimal and sustainable provision of VC for persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their care partners is scarce. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe the frequency of VC use, (2) identify characteristics of PLWD, care partners, and family physicians (FPs) that are associated with the use of VC, and (3) explore FPs' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to provide VC for PLWD and their care partners.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!