A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reducing the healthcare costs of urban air pollution: the South African experience. | LitMetric

Reducing the healthcare costs of urban air pollution: the South African experience.

J Environ Manage

School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa.

Published: July 2007

AI Article Synopsis

  • Air pollutants negatively impact human health, prompting a study on effective policies and technologies to mitigate these effects in densely populated areas of South Africa.
  • The research ranks interventions, finding that low-cost household measures, like proper coal usage and roof insulation, are more efficient than industrial policies.
  • The study suggests prioritizing household interventions before pursuing additional industry regulations, as current industrial measures do not provide sufficient health care cost justification.

Article Abstract

Air pollutants often have adverse effects on human health. This paper investigates and ranks a set of policy and technological interventions intended to reduce such health costs in the high population density areas of South Africa. It initially uses a simple benefit-cost rule, later extended to capture sectoral employment impacts. Although the focus of state air quality legislation is on industrial pollutants, the most efficient interventions were found to be at household level. These included such low-cost interventions as training householders to place kindling above rather than below the coal in a fireplace and insulating roofs. The first non-household policies to emerge involved vehicle fuels and technologies. Most proposed industrial interventions failed a simple cost-benefit test. The paper's policy messages are that interventions should begin with households and that further industry controls are not yet justifiable in their present forms as these relate to the health care costs of such interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.05.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interventions
6
reducing healthcare
4
healthcare costs
4
costs urban
4
urban air
4
air pollution
4
pollution south
4
south african
4
african experience
4
experience air
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!