Radiosurgery versus carbon dioxide laser for dermatochalasis correction in Asians.

Lasers Surg Med

Department of Ophthalmology, Caritas Medical Center, Kowloon, Hong Kong.

Published: February 2007

Background And Objectives: Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser and radiosurgery are techniques commonly employed in oculoplastic surgery. However, there is no literature comparing their results in blepharoplasty.

Study Design/materials And Methods: Twenty Chinese patients with dermatochalasis underwent radiosurgery in one upper eyelid and CO(2) laser in the contralateral eyelid. Intraoperative time, hemorrhage, and pain control were assessed. Subjects were evaluated at postoperative 1 hour, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months for hemorrhage and wound healing by a masked assessor.

Results: All patients reported minimal pain with either technique. A significantly shorter operative time was achieved with CO(2) laser, with better intraoperative hemostasis. There was no significant difference in postoperative hemorrhage and wound swelling between radiosurgery and CO(2) laser. No significant intraoperative complications were noted.

Conclusions: Both radiosurgery and CO(2) laser are equally safe and effective for upper lid blepharoplasty. CO(2) laser achieves shorter operative time with superior intraoperative hemostasis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.20384DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

co2 laser
24
carbon dioxide
8
hemorrhage wound
8
shorter operative
8
operative time
8
intraoperative hemostasis
8
radiosurgery co2
8
laser
7
co2
6
radiosurgery
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!