A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Undergraduate orthodontic assessment and examination in UK dental schools. | LitMetric

Undergraduate orthodontic assessment and examination in UK dental schools.

Br Dent J

Department of Orthodontics, GKT Dental Institute, King's College London, Floor 22 Guy's Tower, St. Thomas Street, London, SE1 9RT.

Published: August 2006

AI Article Synopsis

  • The paper examines the internal assessment methods and BDS examination for undergraduate orthodontics across UK dental schools, noting changes over the last three years and proposing future modifications.
  • Responses from 12 participating dental schools highlighted significant variations in assessment types, formats, and contributions to BDS, including differences in written, clinical, and practical evaluations.
  • The study concludes that the inconsistent assessment practices in orthodontics among UK dental schools call for standardized guidelines to enhance quality and uniformity in future evaluations.

Article Abstract

Aims And Objectives: This paper assesses the current internal assessment and BDS examination of undergraduate orthodontics in UK dental schools, the changes which have occurred in the last three years, and future changes proposed.

Method: Questionnaires were emailed to the undergraduate orthodontic course leaders in each of the UK dental schools. Twelve dental schools agreed to participate in the survey. Responses were checked for completeness, summarised and sent back to individual course leaders to verify. These verified responses were then analysed.

Results: There was a wide variation in the form and content of the in-course assessment and the BDS examination in the 12 UK dental schools. The in-course assessment varied from minimal to extensive, and in its percentage contribution to BDS. The use of written, clinical, and particularly patient treatment and laboratory assessments varied considerably from school to school. The format of the BDS examination varied in the number, type and timing of written examinations, in the number of students examined clinically, and in the use of additional examinations of viva, case presentation, or OSCE.

Conclusions: Comparison of undergraduate orthodontic courses in UK dental schools revealed a wide variation in student assessment and examination. Current orthodontic internal assessments are inconsistent with no common pattern across the courses, and inconsistencies also exist in the BDS examination. Guidelines for orthodontic assessment and examination are needed to ensure standards and consistency in UK dental schools in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813884DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dental schools
28
bds examination
16
undergraduate orthodontic
12
assessment examination
12
orthodontic assessment
8
examination dental
8
assessment bds
8
course leaders
8
wide variation
8
in-course assessment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!