Variation of atomic charges on proton transfer in strong hydrogen bonds: the case of anionic and neutral imidazole-acetate complexes.

J Comput Chem

Departamento de Biotecnología, Unidad de Química y Bioquímica, E.T.S.I. Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Published: November 2006

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines atomic charge changes during proton transfer in hydrogen bonding complexes related to histidine and aspartate pairs, using various computational methods.
  • It highlights that greater charge transfer occurs in anionic complexes compared to neutral ones, with medium polarity influencing the extent of this transfer.
  • The analysis underscores the importance of electron correlation in charge calculations, noting that uncorrelated methods can overestimate values and their variations.

Article Abstract

The variation of atomic charges upon proton transfer in hydrogen bonding complexes of 4-methylimidazole, in both neutral and protonated cationic forms, and acetate anion, is investigated. These complexes model the histidine (neutral and protonated)-aspartate pair present in active sites of proteases where strong N--H...O hydrogen bonds are formed. Three procedures (Merz-Kollman scheme, Natural Population Analysis, and Atoms in Molecules Method) are used to compute atomic charges and explore their variation upon H-transfer in the gas phase and in the presence of two continuum media with dielectric constants 5 (protein interiors) and 78.39 (water). The effect of electron correlation was also studied by comparing Hartree-Fock and MP2 results for both complexes in the gas phase. Greater net charge interchanged upon H-transfer is observed in the anionic complex with respect to the neutral complex. Raising the polarity of the medium increases the amount of net charge transfer in both complexes, although the neutral system exhibits a larger sensitivity to the presence of solvent. Charge transfer associated to N--H...O and N...H--O bonds reveal the ionic contribution to the interaction depending on the number of charged subunits but the presence of solvent affects little this quantity. The lack of electron correlation overestimates all the charges as well as their variations and so uncorrelated calculations should be avoided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20476DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atomic charges
12
variation atomic
8
charges proton
8
proton transfer
8
hydrogen bonds
8
gas phase
8
electron correlation
8
net charge
8
charge transfer
8
presence solvent
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!