[Distraction osteogenesis in the head and neck region].

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam.

Published: July 2006

Distraction osteogenesis is used in oral and maxillofacial surgery for the purpose of lengthening or widening an upper or lower jaw or to reposition the jaw to such an extent as cannot be achieved with normal osteotomy. This technique moves the parts of an osteomised bone slowly apart. Subsequently, new trabecular bone growth occurs between the separate bone parts that is then turned into bone with a normal mineralised architecture. Extraoral distractors can be fitted, activated, positioned and removed fairly easily. Distractors for intraoral placement do not cause any extraoral scars and are less burdensome in their daily use. Some distractors can impede access to the larynx and the trachea. For elective surgical procedures, the accessibility of the larynx can be judged with a laryngoscope for the induction and ending of anaesthesia. Should the intraoral or extraoral distractors form any obstruction in this process, then they should be removed. The alternatives are fibroscopic intubation and emergency tracheotomy.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extraoral distractors
8
[distraction osteogenesis
4
osteogenesis head
4
head neck
4
neck region]
4
region] distraction
4
distraction osteogenesis
4
osteogenesis oral
4
oral maxillofacial
4
maxillofacial surgery
4

Similar Publications

Objective: Finite element analysis (FEA) of the biomechanical properties of the modified extraoral distractor device used in the mandibular distraction of craniofacial microsomia patients.

Materials And Methods: Finite element analysis (FEA) models of 5 patients under 2 working conditions, the instance when the distractor is activated and when the distractor participates in mastication, were included in the current study. To conduct the FEA, load boundary conditions (35.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of the use of computer-guided surgical templates in association with mandibular distraction osteogenesis to correct mandibular asymmetry. In the study group a simulation process was conducted to restore the exact position of the chin skeletally by planning the osteotomy orientation, distractor vector, pin positions, and distraction distance calculation. The Control group was treated with conventional distraction in which an oblique osteotomy was done, and distraction was performed until the midline coincided.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Aim Of The Study: Finite element analysis of the stresses subjected to both the intraoral and the extraoral distractors devices used in the mandibular distraction of hemifacial microsomia patients.

Methodology: Two models were included in the current study. The first model was an extraoral distractor and the second model was an intraoral distractor model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This case report demonstrates the successful use of intraoral distractor/hygenic rapid expander (HYRAX) for rapid maxillary expansion in anteroposterior direction with an adjunctive use of face mask therapy for anterior orthopedic traction of maxillary complex in a cleft patient with concave profile. The patient was a 13-year-old girl who reported with a chief complaint of backwardly positioned upper jaw and a severely forward positioned lower jaw. Therefore, a treatment was chosen in which acrylic bonded rapid maxillary expansion was done with tooth tissue borne intraoral distractor/HYRAX having a different activation schedule along with Dr Henri Petit facemask to treat maxillary retrognathism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Assessment of stress and micromotions using finite element analysis along both the intraoral and the extraoral distractors devices used in the mandibular distraction of post temporomandibular joint ankylosis deformed mandible patients. The process of finite element analysis was carried out to assess distraction models. The first model was an extraoral mandibular distraction model and the second model was an intraoral mandibular distraction model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!