The aim of the research was to identify the caregivers' response patterns when breaking bad news at the first time of cancer diagnosis and their affect on the patient. These issues were examined from 3 points of view: patients, doctors, and nurses. A total of 152 Israelis subjects participated in the research: 51 patients with cancer, 51 nurses, and 50 doctors. They filled out a questionnaire developed for the research that included 35 items. Support patterns identified as effective were as follows: allowing for the expression of emotions, empathetic silence, support through touch, and the use of participatory, commendation, and encouragement statements. The research findings indicate the crucial need in the involvement of a family member and a nurse in the process and in supplying written information for the receiver of the news. Significant differences (P < .05) between patients and caregivers were found in the type of information given, in the timing and quantity, and in the support and communication patterns. The principal emotions professional caregivers experienced were identification and helplessness. Most of them were not trained in this field. The research findings could bridge the gap between what patients want and what caregivers do and would benefit in designing guidelines for breaking bad news and formulating a workshop program for furthering the team skills.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200607000-00009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breaking bad
12
bad news
12
patients doctors
8
points view
8
patients caregivers
8
patients
5
caregivers' role
4
role breaking
4
news
4
news patients
4

Similar Publications

When health professions learners do not meet standards on assessments, educators need to share this information with the learners and determine next steps to improve their performance. Those conversations can be difficult, and educators may lack confidence or skill in holding them. For clinician-educators with experience sharing challenging news with patients, using an analogy from clinical settings may help with these conversations in the education context.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Effective communication is a critical and fundamental element of a successful medical practice and exerts a substantial influence on patient contentment, adherence, and disease outcome. This study was planned to identify domains for improvement in doctor-patient communication to enhance good practices in the future.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out involving 500 randomly selected samples of clinicians from government or private medical colleges across India.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: New Zealand guidelines stipulate that patient consent is obtained for medical student involvement in clinical care, however, patients' preferences regarding consent for medical student teaching have not been widely explored. This study examined patient preferences for consent for medical student teaching with the aim to increase patient empowerment, to optimise care and to reflect societal expectations more accurately.

Method: Observational, semi-qualitative, cross-sectional study of in-patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The COPD Kaleidoscope: Breaking Bad Dogmatic Recommendations.

Arch Bronconeumol

December 2024

Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!