A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation for post-extubation respiratory support under deep anesthesia in hypertension patients]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Study evaluated BiPAP ventilation for post-extubation respiratory support during deep anesthesia in hypertensive patients undergoing surgery.
  • Forty patients were split into two groups: one extubated awake and the other under deep anesthesia, with differing effects on blood pressure and heart rate post-extubation.
  • Results indicated BiPAP helped maintain stable blood gas levels and reduced complications during recovery compared to extubation while awake, suggesting its effectiveness in this patient group.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of bi-level positive airway pressure ventilation (BiPAP) for post-extubation respiratory support under deep anesthesia in hypertension patients.

Methods: Forty primary hypertension patients who were scheduled for lower abdominal surgery or total hip joint replacement were randomly divided into 2 groups: one was extubated when being awake (Group A, n = 20, and the other was extubated under deep anesthesia (Group B, n = 20). The combined inhalation and the intravenous general anesthesia were performed on all patients, and inhalation anesthesia was maintained with only continued infusion of propofol when major procedure of surgery had been finished. In Group A, anesthesia was ceased when the surgery was finished, and trachea was removed after the patients awoke. In Group B, anesthesia was ceased immediately before the extubation, and trachea was removed under deep anesthesia, followed by an uninvasive ventilation of BiPAP. Blood pressure (BP, heart rate ( HR, and bispectral index (BIS) before or after the extubation, artery blood-gass analysis in BIPAP, and the incidence rate of complication in the recovery period were recorded.

Results: In Group A, BP and HR increased significantly after the patients awoke (P < 0.01) and after the extubation (P < 0.05), compared with the data before the surgery and before the extubation. In Group B, however, BP and HR had no difference before and after the extubation, and the data of blood gas maintained approximately normal. The incidence rate of glos- soptosis in Group B was obviously higher than those in Group A (P < 0.01), while complications such as cough during the recovery stage in Group A were more than those in Group B (P <0.05).

Conclusion: BiPAP is suitable for post-extubation respiratory support under deep anesthesia in hypertension patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep anesthesia
16
group
10
positive airway
8
airway pressure
8
pressure ventilation
8
post-extubation respiratory
8
respiratory support
8
support deep
8
anesthesia
8
anesthesia hypertension
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!