Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is one of main predecessors of chronic heart failure (CHF), for the treatment of which angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are recommended at present. It seems logical to prescribe ACEI in early period of MI in order to prevent development of CHF in postinfarction period. For assessment of benefit and risk related to prescription of ACEI early after onset of acute MI multiple placebo controlled trials have been carried out. Data obtained in these trials evidence for inexpediency of wide use of ACEI in acute period of MI. Several categories of patients with acute MI with stable hemodynamics have been established in whom benefit of early prescription of ACEI noticeably outweighs possible risk. Those are patients with clinical manifestations of CHF or echocardiographical signs of systolic left ventricular dysfunction as well as patients with high risk of development of CHF in postinfarction period. The latter group comprises patients with transmural MI of the anterior left ventricular wall in whom thrombolytic therapy either have not been carried out or have been ineffective, patients with diabetes mellitus or hypertension in anamnesis. In all other cases prescription of ACEI in early period of acute MI might be dangerous because hypotension induced by them can worsen blood flow and aggravate ischemic injury of the myocardium and increase dimensions of MI.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acei early
12
prescription acei
12
converting enzyme
8
enzyme inhibitors
8
acute period
8
myocardial infarction
8
early period
8
development chf
8
chf postinfarction
8
postinfarction period
8

Similar Publications

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the most common cause of drug-induced angioedema in the United States. Our primary objective was to provide descriptive evidence regarding emergency department (ED) disposition of ACEI-induced angioedema patients. Our secondary objective was to evaluate unique patterns in those with ACEI-induced angioedema at a tertiary referral center, including demographics, details of those requiring intubation, length of inpatient stay, and allergy documentation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Whether prior treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) modifies efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) in patients with heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction (EF) >40% is unclear, thus Sac/Val according to ACEi/ARB status at baseline was assessed.

Methods And Results: This was a pre-specified analysis of Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF (PARAGLIDE-HF), a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of Sac/Val versus valsartan, categorizing patients according to baseline ACEi/ARB status. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline through weeks 4 and 8.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome in which structural or functional abnormalities of the heart result in impaired ventricular filling or ejection capacity. In order to improve the adaptability of models to different patient populations and data situations. This study aims to develop predictive models for HF risk using six machine learning algorithms, providing valuable insights into the early assessment and recognition of HF by clinical features.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Data about the safety of ACEI/ARB use in early (<3 months) posttransplant period are restricted and remain controversial.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included searches of PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL from inception to 31 November 2023, for studies to compare the safety (transplant outcomes and postoperative complications) of ACEI/ARB with non-ACEI/ARB (other antihypertensive medications) initiation in early post kidney transplant period.

Results: Of 1,247 citations identified, 13 eligible studies involving 1919 patients were enrolled for analyses.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The randomized controlled study explored whether physiological ischemia training (PIT) can inhibit ventricular remodeling and reduce ventricular arrhythmias in the early period of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Methods: AMI patients with hypotension or bradycardia were randomly divided into PIT (n = 21) and control (n = 20) groups. Meanwhile, patients with normal blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were randomly divided into PIT+angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and/or β-blocker (AB) (n = 30) and AB (n = 30) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!