The impact of mass school immunization on school attendance.

J Sch Nurs

Community Nursing, Pediatrics, Pediatric Intensive Care, Pediatric Specialty Clinics, Parkview Hospital, Fort Wayne, IN, USA.

Published: August 2006

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact a free, on-site influenza immunization program could have on attendance in Title 1 schools. Four Title 1 elementary schools participated in the study. Students at 2 schools were offered free FluMist immunizations on site, and students at 2 control schools were not. Compliance on receiving FluMist was measured on the percentage of students participating after evaluating for medical exclusions. Documentation on the reason for absences at all 4 schools included self- or parent-reported influenza. Attendance rates for the year also were compared with the previous year for all 4 schools. A comparison was done of total days absent versus total days enrolled between schools receiving FluMist and schools not receiving the vaccine. Despite the fact that FluMist is a new vaccine and is not required for children, 57% of those medically eligible to receive it had parental permission and received the vaccine. The 2 schools receiving FluMist increased their attendance rates from 95.3% and 93.9% to 96.1% and 95.8%. Previously, the comparison schools each had a 94.6% attendance rate; one fell to 94.4% and the other rose very slightly to 94.7%. The differences in self- or parent-reported influenza absences were not significant. However, the difference in days absent between individual vaccinated and nonvaccinated schools was statistically significant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10598405050220040601DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

receiving flumist
12
schools receiving
12
schools
11
self- parent-reported
8
parent-reported influenza
8
attendance rates
8
total days
8
days absent
8
attendance
5
flumist
5

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • A study investigated the impact of pre-existing immunocompromising conditions (ICCs) on pediatric patients with acute COVID-19 admitted to intensive care across 55 hospitals in the U.S.!
  • Out of 1,274 patients, 105 had ICCs, which were linked to higher in-hospital mortality (11.4% vs. 4.6%) and longer hospital stays, although initial disease severity was similar between those with and without ICCs.!
  • Despite the challenges, most patients with ICCs survived and left the hospital without new severe health issues, highlighting a positive aspect of the outcomes for these vulnerable patients.!
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Compared to intramuscular vaccines, nasally administered vaccines have the advantage of inducing local mucosal immune responses that may block infection and interrupt transmission of respiratory pathogens. Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) is effective in preventing influenza in children, but a correlate of protection for LAIV remains unclear. Studying young adult volunteers, we observe that LAIV induces distinct, compartmentalized, antibody responses in the mucosa and blood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • A phase 1b study evaluated the safety and immune response of an intranasal M2-deficient single replication (M2SR) influenza vaccine in adults aged 18-49.
  • Subjects received two doses of the vaccine, with results showing significant increases in neutralizing antibodies after higher doses; 80.6% demonstrated a response after the 109 TCID50 dose.
  • The vaccine was well tolerated and elicited both mucosal and cellular immune responses, suggesting its potential effectiveness against drifted H3N2 influenza strains.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify number of children who received live vaccines outside recommended intervals between doses and calculate corrective revaccination costs.

Methods: We analyzed >1.6 million vaccination records for children aged 12 months through 6 years from six immunization information system (IIS) Sentinel Sites from 2014-15 when live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV, FluMist® Quadrivalent) was recommended for use, and from 2016-17, when not recommended for use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This report updates the 2017-18 recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) regarding the use of seasonal influenza vaccines in the United States (MMWR Recomm Rep 2017;66[No. RR-2]). Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months who do not have contraindications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!