Background: Discography has been widely used in the lumbar and cervical spine as a diagnostic tool to identify sources of discogenic pain that may be amenable to surgical treatment. Discography in the cervical spine is currently performed without the benefit of pressure monitoring, and corresponding pressure parameters have not been determined.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop the framework for intradiscal pressure monitoring in the cervical spine and the basis for a pressure curve that will reflect clinically significant cervical internal disc disruption. We also sought to determine whether there is any pressure increase in adjacent discs during cervical discography that might result in false-positive diagnosis during in-vivo discography. An additional goal was to establish safe upper parameters for infusion volume and intradiscal pressure in the cervical spine.
Design: Investigation of fresh-frozen discs in the cervical spine.
Methods: Investigated were 26 discs in 5 fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spines aged 45 to 68 with no prior history of cervical spine disease. A T2 MRI was performed on each specimen and radiographically abnormal discs were noted. Pressure-controlled, fluoroscopically guided discography was performed on each level using a right lateral approach. Opening pressure, rupture pressure, volume infused, and location of rupture were recorded. Pressures were simultaneously recorded at each adjacent disc level using additional pressure monitors and identical needle placement. Immediately following discography, CT was performed on each specimen according to the discography protocol.
Results: Twenty-six discs C2-3 to C7-T1 were grossly intact for evaluation. The median opening pressure was 30 psi (range 14-101 psi). Two discs did not rupture and were pressurized to 367 psi. In 24 discs, the median intradiscal rupture pressure was 40 psi (range 14-171 psi). The median volume infused at rupture was 0.5 ml (range 0.25-1.0 ml). When grouped, the median intradiscal rupture pressure in the C2-3, C3-4, and C7-T1 discs was 53 psi (range 16-171 psi) compared to 36.5 psi (range 14-150 psi) in the C4-5, C5-6, and C6-7 discs (p=0.18). There was no measurable pressure change in any of the 30 adjacent disc levels evaluated.
Conclusion: In the cervical spine, iatrogenic disc injury may be caused at significantly lower pressures and volumes infused than in the lumbar spine. There was no measurable pressure change in any of the adjacent disc levels evaluated at maximum intradiscal pressurization. Further cadaveric testing will be necessary to develop parameters for intradiscal pressure monitoring in the cervical spine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Objective: The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess postural stability using force plate center of pressure (COP) parameters in a large sample of Chinese patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM), compare the results with healthy controls, and examine correlations between balance measures (COP parameters, brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test [Brief-BESTest] scores) and clinical assessments, including MRI findings.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study included 141 patients with DCM (diagnosed from June 2022 to May 2024) and 141 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Postural balance was assessed using COP parameters and Brief-BESTest scores.
Curr Pain Headache Rep
March 2025
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Purpose Of Review: This review aims to assess the effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in treating axial spinal pain originating from the facet joints. A systematic evaluation of available evidence on these biological therapies was conducted to determine their clinical utility.
Recent Findings: Recent studies emphasize the therapeutic promise of intraarticular biologics, including MSCs, PRP, and alpha-2-macroglobulin, in managing facet joint-related axial spinal pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
March 2025
Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY, USA.
Study Design: Retrospective analysis.
Objective: To compare clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) among patients with different radiographical difficult spondylolisthesis.
Summary Of Background Context: High-grade vertebral slip, collapsed disc, and less mobile segment can complicate segmental parameter restoration in MIS-TLIF.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
March 2025
Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Spine Surgery, 535 E. 70st St, New York, New York, 10021, USA.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To compare distal lordosis (DL) and lumbar lordosis (LL) generated by single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and open TLIF at L4-L5 and L5-S1.
Summary Of Background Data: Restoring or maintaining L4-S1 DL and LL is an important component of TLIF surgery.
Global Spine J
March 2025
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Study DesignSingle-centre controlled pilot study.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of prophylactic surgery and to review the biases of a therapeutic trial in asymptomatic degenerative cervical cord compression (ADCC) patients.MethodsPatients with ADCC and at least 1 predictor of progression to symptomatic degenerative cervical cord myelopathy (DCM) were offered either prophylactic surgery or standard structured rehabilitation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!