A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Myeloma renal disease: presentation and outcome. | LitMetric

Myeloma renal disease: presentation and outcome.

Nephron Clin Pract

Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.

Published: November 2006

Background: Renal disease can be the first presentation of multiple myeloma (MM) or develop during the disease process.

Aim: To define the mode of presentation of MM to nephrologists and determine the association with patient characteristics and outcome.

Methods: MM patients referred to a tertiary renal unit were studied retrospectively. Group I presented to nephrologists prior to MM diagnosis (n = 36); group II was referred to nephrology after diagnosis (n = 27), and group III was known only to haematology and never referred (n = 91). Age at presentation, gender, paraprotein type, need for dialysis, haematological and biochemical parameters, and survival were examined.

Results: Of the 154 MM patients, 23.4% presented with renal impairment (group I), 17.5% were referred to nephrology after MM diagnosis (group II) and 59.1% did not receive renal input (group III). On presentation, group I had a median serum creatinine (sCr) of 700 (range 341-1,023) micromol/l and 80% required dialysis. Although the median sCr on presentation for group II was 131 (range 103-373) micromol/l, median sCr on renal referral was 554 (range 181-807) micromol/l and 57% needed dialysis. In contrast, the median sCr on presentation for group III was only 99 (range 85-117) micromol/l. Group I was more anaemic (p < 0.001) and had higher beta(2)-microglobulin levels (p < 0.0001) on presentation compared to groups II and III. For groups I and II, the median survival after diagnosis (10.2 vs. 24.7 months, p = 0.11) and renal referral (10.5 vs. 20.0 months, p = 0.68) was not significantly different.

Conclusion: Survival in myeloma renal disease remains poor regardless of the mode of presentation to nephrologists.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000094545DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

renal disease
12
diagnosis group
12
group iii
12
presentation group
12
median scr
12
group
10
presentation
9
myeloma renal
8
disease presentation
8
mode presentation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!