This study examined the relationship between moral reasoning, provictim attitudes, and interpersonal aggression among imprisoned young offenders. The participants were 60 imprisoned male young offenders from a young offender institution or remand centre. Using the Direct and Indirect Prisoner Behaviour Checklist, the offenders were categorised as one of four groups: perpetrator, victim, perpetrator-victim, or not involved. Participants in the four groups were compared on measures of provictim attitudes and sociomoral reasoning. The results showed that the majority of the participants were involved in victimising behaviours, with 43.3% falling into the perpetrator-victim category. Victims had significantly more empathic attitudes toward victims than did those in the perpetrator-victim group. No significant differences were found among the four groups on the sociomoral reasoning measure, nor was there a significant correlation between sociomoral reasoning and provictim attitudes. The results are discussed in terms of previous research and their implications for practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05281907DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

provictim attitudes
16
reasoning provictim
12
young offenders
12
sociomoral reasoning
12
relationship moral
8
moral reasoning
8
attitudes interpersonal
8
interpersonal aggression
8
aggression imprisoned
8
imprisoned young
8

Similar Publications

Unlabelled: Sexual violence against women, including rape, is a serious public health issue in many countries. Rape victims often meet health professionals in medical institutions for a range of health problems. The aim of this research was investigation of attitudes towards rape victims among medical students.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Development and validation of the willingness to intervene in bullying scale.

Br J Educ Psychol

June 2020

Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority, Wan Chai, Hong Kong.

Background: Most bullying incidents occur in the presence of bystanders, with few choosing to intervene. Therefore, the development of a valid instrument to measure individuals' willingness to intervene in bullying is warranted.

Aims: This study aimed to develop as well as validate a self-reported willingness to intervene in bullying scale (WIBS) for secondary school students.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

KiVa Anti-Bullying Program in Italy: Evidence of Effectiveness in a Randomized Control Trial.

Prev Sci

November 2016

Department of Educational Science and Psychology, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi, 12, Complesso di San Salvi Padiglione 26, 50135, Florence, Italy.

The present study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the KiVa anti-bullying program in Italy through a randomized control trial of students in grades 4 and 6. The sample involved 2042 students (51 % female; grade 4, mean age = 8.85; ds = 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Employing the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act (HCPA) of 2009 and other such legislation as a backdrop, the present study evaluated the nature of beliefs about hate-crime legislation, offenders, and victims. In addition, it investigated construct validity (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The present study investigated the influence of a sexual assault nurse examiner's (SANE's) testimony on mock juror perceptions of a child or adolescent victim of child sexual assault. Community members (N = 252, 156 females) read a fictional criminal trial summary of a child sexual assault case in which the victim was 6 or 15 years old and the prosecution presented medical testimony from a SANE or a traditional registered nurse (RN), or did not present medical testimony. Mock jurors were more likely to render guilty verdicts when a SANE testified compared with the other two testimony conditions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!