Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer of four serum tumor markers, carbohydrate antigen (CA) 199, CA242, CA50 and carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and fecal k-ras and p53 gene mutations.
Methods: From February 2002 to March 2004, 136 patients were consecutively diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in the three participating medical centers. The diagnosis was confirmed by pathology in 53 patients, of whom five were excluded because they did not have measurement of serum tumor marker. The remaining 48 patients comprised the case group in the study. Ninety-six patients with benign digestive diseases diagnosed during the same period were recruited as control subjects. They were matched by sex and age. In both groups, serum CA199, CA242, CA50 and CEA were measured by ELISA, and fecal k-ras and p53 gene mutations were measured by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and PCR-single strand conformational polymorphism, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to compare their diagnostic value, as well as the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio. Moreover, independent and sensitive tests from these non-invasive approaches were selected to form a parallel test that may have further improved sensitivity for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Results: The AUC of serum CA199 and CA242 were 0.821 (95%CI 0.725-0.917) and 0.821 (95%CI 0.723-0.919), respectively. The optimal diagnostic value of serum CA199 for pancreatic cancer was 93 U/mL, with a sensitivity of 73.7% and specificity of 91.4%. The positive likelihood ratio of CA199 was 8.57, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.29. The optimal diagnostic value of serum CA242 was 25 U/mL, with a sensitivity of 71.1% and specificity of 93.5%. The positive likelihood ratio of CA242 was 10.94, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.31. The sensitivity of fecal k-ras gene mutation for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was 77.4%, and the specificity was 81.2%. The positive and negative likelihood ratios of fecal k-ras gene mutation were 4.12 and 0.28, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of fecal p53 gene mutation were 25.8% and 95.3%, respectively, and its positive and negative likelihood ratios were 5.49 and 0.78. The rate of fecal k-ras mutation was higher in patients with benign pancreatic diseases (57.14%) than that of controls with non-pancreatic disorders. The values of serum tumor markers and fecal k-ras and p53 gene mutation rates were not significantly different in subgroups according to site or stage of pancreatic cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of the parallel test of serum CA199 and fecal k-ras gene mutation were 94.06% and 74.22%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of the parallel test of serum CA242 and fecal k-ras were 93.47% and 75.92%, respectively.
Conclusions: Serum CA199 and CA242 are valuable diagnostic tools for pancreatic cancer. The diagnostic value is further improved when they are combined with fecal k-ras gene mutation measurement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-9573.2006.00263.x | DOI Listing |
Front Oncol
June 2020
Department of Microbiology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.
The cellular microenvironment, diet, and lifestyle play a key role in the occurrence of colorectal cancer. Due to its rising trend, attempts are being made to devise novel biointerventions as adjunct to conventional therapies to prevent this deadly disease. "Metabiotics," the beneficial metabolic signatures of probiotics are emerging as potential anticancer agent due to their ability to alter metabolic processes in the gut lumen and reduce the severity of colon carcinogenesis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Ther Med
January 2018
Institute for Biomedical Engineering and Nano Science, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of detecting K-ras mutation by using magnetic nanoparticles in fecal samples of patients with pancreatic cancer at different stages. The novel methodology of K-ras mutation detection was compared to the existing methodology of cancer antigen (CA)19-9 examination. Patients with pancreatic cancer (n=88), pancreatic benign diseases who displayed chronic pancreatitis (n=35), pancreatic mucinous cyst neoplasms (n=10) and pancreatic serous cyst (n=9) admitted to the Department of Surgery, Jiaxing Second Hospital were enrolled in the present study.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGut Pathog
June 2017
Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655 Japan.
Background: Recent studies show that some strains possessing a gene cluster named the island might have a causative role in the development of human colorectal cancer (CRC). In several reports from Europe, they are found more prevalently in colon tissue specimens derived from CRC patients compared to those from controls. In this study we sought to clarify the difference in prevalence between CRC patients and non-CRC controls in the Japanese population, by using non-invasive sample collection technique during colonoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDig Dis Sci
March 2017
Medical Affairs, Exact Sciences Corporation, 441 Charmany Dr., Madison, WI, 53719, USA.
Background: Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening detects most asymptomatic colorectal cancers. Combining FIT screening with stool-based genetic biomarkers increases sensitivity for cancer, but whether DNA biomarkers (biomarkers) differ for cancers detected versus missed by FIT screening has not been evaluated in a community-based population.
Aims: To evaluate tissue biomarkers among Kaiser Permanente Northern California patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer within 2 years after FIT screening.
J Gastrointest Cancer
June 2016
Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Purpose: We report an update of current methods for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on fecal sample analysis.
Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Direct electronic databases.
Results: Blood in the stools is the first and most used strategy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!