A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Potential use of freeze-drying technique for estimation of tissue water content. | LitMetric

Potential use of freeze-drying technique for estimation of tissue water content.

Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol

Faculty of Pharmacy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Published: May 2006

Desiccation and freeze-drying methods were used for the estimation of water content of various rat tissues. In the desiccation method, the tissue samples were cut into small pieces and subsequently dried at 40 degrees C to constant weight. In the freeze-drying method, the prefrozen tissue samples were freeze-dried (-50 degrees C) for 24 h. Tissue water contents obtained by the desiccation and freeze-drying methods were very similar, with no significant difference between them. Regardless of the method, the highest tissue water content was found in testes (0.841 +/- 0.010 ml/g for freeze-drying and 0.865 +/- 0.002 ml/g for desiccation); the lowest values were obtained in bone (0.254 +/- 0.007 ml/g for freeze-drying and 0.267 +/- 0.003 ml/g for desiccation). Upon correction for the water content of residual tissue blood, regardless of the drying method, significant differences were found between corrected and uncorrected tissue water values of all tissues. However, for a given method, the difference between the tissue water contents was not significant after correcting for residual blood. The water content values for all tissues (except bone) agree well with those published previously and obtained by desiccation. All these clearly suggest that the freeze-drying method can be used as an alternative to desiccation for estimation of tissue water content.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1358/mf.2006.28.4.990200DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tissue water
24
water content
24
tissue
9
water
9
estimation tissue
8
desiccation freeze-drying
8
freeze-drying methods
8
tissue samples
8
freeze-drying method
8
water contents
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!