Introduction: Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse offers short-term advantages compared with operations performed by laparotomy. The aim of this prospective study was to report technical and functional outcome after laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory in consecutive patients operated on by a single surgeon.
Patients And Methods: From May 1996 to July 2004, 54 consecutive patients (47 women), median age 53 years (range: 16-84 years), underwent laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory for complete rectal prolapse. Preoperative evaluation included physical examination, dynamic videoproctography and, in patients with constipation, colonic transit time (with radiopaque markers). Postoperative evaluation included the same examinations and a simple global quality-of-life questionnaire.
Results: Conversion to laparotomy was required for three patients during the learning curve. Median duration of operation was 157 minutes (range: 50-370). There was no mortality and morbidity was 5.5% (brachial plexus palsy in two patients and urinary tract infection in one). Median hospital stay was 3.5 days (range: 1-11). There were 4 recurrences (7.4%). Functional outcome at 12 months showed the presence of constipation in 20.3% of patients (persistence in eight and de novo in three) and the presence of outlet obstruction in 25.9% of patients (persistence in six and de novo in eight). Anal continence improved in 72.4% of the 29 patients who complained of this symptom. The global quality-of-life questionnaire showed a satisfactory result in 96% of patients.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic rectopexy to the promontory is a safe and efficient procedure to treat complete rectal prolapse; morbidity is low. Functional outcome is at least equivalent to that obtained with open procedures in terms of continence, constipation and outlet obstruction.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73257-2 | DOI Listing |
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Saga University, Saga, Japan.
Laparoscopic procedure for rectal prolapse has extend throughout the world as a minimally invasive treatment. Various techniques have been reported regarding the use of mesh, fixation, and rectal mobilization. However, a standard technique has not been established yet.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Gynaecol Obstet
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Surg Endosc
December 2024
Clarunis, University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel Postfach, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Background: Ventral mesh rectopexy (laparoscopic and robotic) is a common and well established treatment of rectal prolapse. Although described as safe and effective, complications, especially mesh-associated ones are often mentioned. Additionally, there is no consensus regarding the mesh type and fixation method as well as the materials used for this purpose.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFColorectal Dis
November 2024
Surgical Clinic 2, Hospital Maciel, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Fr J Urol
November 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
Introduction: The concomitant presence of a rectocele with obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is highly probable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of native tissue vaginal rectocele repair (VRR) and laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in terms of functional outcome via the medium to long-term ODS score evaluation.
Material: This was a retrospective cohort study.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!